Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.

However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.

Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3, right down to the amount of shooting and wanton destruction.

I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of little more than abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.

However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.

Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3: and with just as much shooting.

I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of little more than abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Tough one. Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.

However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.

Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3: and with just as much shooting.

I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of little more than abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Tough one. Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.

However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.

Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3: and with just as much shooting.

I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of none but abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Tough one. Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.

However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.

Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction focused to varying extents. Jak 2 in particular was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3: and with just as much shooting.

I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of none but abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.

1 year ago
1 score