I don't disagree with you that our society is in fact a gynocracy. Our leaders cater to the whims of woman and are entirely guided by the pussy.

An extreme example is say the King of a great empire is infatuated with a woman to such a point that he goes to war because she whispered temptations into his ear. One has to ask, who is really in control. The man with all the power or the woman who is able to influence this man with power using nothing more than her charms?

From an outwardly direct perspective, it's the King who is in charge but from an inwardly indirect perspective, it's truly the woman running the show.

That is in fact our society. The woman hold sway over the rich and powerful such that the rich and powerful caters to women while oppressing men. But it is not a group of witches meeting up in a round table to discuss how they will continue to dominate the world. In the west, it is mostly Jews who do this type of meeting and who outwardly truly hold the power.

Where you and those that focus on race can maybe find common-ground is in this. What if men who weren't so easily influenced by women and who wouldn't cater to women such that our society wouldn't be a gynocracy were the men in power? What if the reason things are so gynocratic is because it's mostly Jews in charge? Even if you don't subscribe to this notion, one fact remains, the men who do have power today are simps and cater to women so they are as much a problem as the women and these men need to be replaced one way or another and many of the men who need to be replaced are Jews.

I don't disagree with you that our society is in fact a gynocracy. Our leaders cater to the whims of woman and are entirely guided by the pussy.

An extreme example is say the King of a great empire is infatuated with a woman to such a point that she goes to war because he whispered temptations into his ear. One has to ask, who is really in control. The man with all the power or the woman who is able to influence this man with power using nothing more than her charms?

From an outwardly direct perspective, it's the King who is in charge but from an inwardly indirect perspective, it's truly the woman running the show.

That is in fact our society. The woman hold sway over the rich and powerful such that the rich and powerful caters to women while oppressing men. But it is not a group of witches meeting up in a round table to discuss how they will continue to dominate the world. In the west, it is mostly Jews who do this type of meeting and who outwardly truly hold the power.

Where you and those that focus on race can maybe find common-ground is in this. What if men who weren't so easily influenced by women and who wouldn't cater to women such that our society wouldn't be a gynocracy were the men in power? What if the reason things are so gynocratic is because it's mostly Jews in charge? Even if you don't subscribe to this notion, one fact remains, the men who do have power today are simps and cater to women so they are as much a problem as the women and these men need to be replaced one way or another and many of the men who need to be replaced are Jews.