Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The gene therapy you championed is a harmful failure.

The hysterical propaganda according to which "vaccines saved humanity" is pushing me towards rejecting all vaccination because its proponents keep lying.

Yes there are several vaccines that reliably immunise the recipient for a low risk of mild to severe effects that make the risk worth it shall the person wish to tale it. Like all treatments, there are varying risks and benefits for each of them.

Some that were routine turned-out to be totally useless on follow-up studied because their "efficacy" was an accidental correlation to improved life conditions, like the anti-tuberculosis vaccine. It dosen't work. It's being discontinued all over the world as each country's "experts" reluctantly admit they were wrong and it dosen't immunize, dosen't reduce transmission and dosen't improve outcomes when taking a step back and having better studies. ( Sounds familiar? )

Childhood mortality started sharply falling before vaccination, and humanity was steadily increasing in numbers before the vaccines. Why? Better hygene, more and better food, antibiotics, etc.

When you push agressively for systematic chickenpox vaccine, which loses its immunity effect after a few years, I'm out. Infection grants lifelong immunity. The virus is never going away because the vaccine fails too often. Post natural-immunity exposure is protective against shingles.

Vaccinating children against chickenpox creates an oppprtunity for adult and senior checkenpox infections.

It should have been reserved for high-risk children, period. But you can't accept that. Submission to every vaccine must be total or the black sheep is a "dirty antivaxer".

Your trigger-hair response to criticism of vaccines make you supress studies on the harmful side-effects of them. You decided they did no harm when clearly they did. Because you must "own the antivaxers" no matter how many you harmed and killed.

So I will become the "anti-vaxer" because you have to be stopped before you kill more people with vaxcultist sledgehammer public health mandates.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The gene therapy you championed is a harmful failure.

The hysterical propaganda according to which "vaccines saved humanity" is pushing me towards rejecting all vaccination because its proponents keep lying.

Yes there are several vaccines that reliably immunise the recipient for a low risk of mild to severe effects that make the risk worth it shall the person wish to tale it. Like all treatments, there are varying risks and benefits for each of them.

Some that were routine turned-out to be totally useless on follow-up studied because their "efficacy" was an accidental correlation to improved life conditions, like the anti-tubercukosos vaccine. It dosen't work. It's being discontinued all over the world as each country's "experts" reluctantly admit they were wrong and it dosen't immunize, dosen't reduce transmission and dosen't improve outcomes when taking a step back and having better studies. ( Sounds familiar? )

Childhood mortality started sharply falling before vaccination, and humanity was steadily increasing in numbers before the vaccines. Why? Better hygene, more and better food, antibiotics, etc.

When you push agressively for systematic chickenpox vaccine, which loses its immunity effect after a few years, I'm out. Infection grants lifelong immunity. The virus is never going away because the vaccine fails too often. Post natural-immunity exposure is protective against shingles.

Vaccinating children against chickenpox creates an oppprtunity for adult and senior checkenpox infections.

It should have been reserved for high-risk children, period. But you can't accept that. Submission to every vaccine must be total or the black sheep is a "dirty antivaxer".

Your trigger-hair response to criticism of vaccines make you supress studies on the harmful side-effects of them. You decided they did no harm when clearly they did. Because you must "own the antivaxers" no matter how many you harmed and killed.

So I will become the "anti-vaxer" because you have to be stopped before you kill more people with vaxcultist sledgehammer public health mandates.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The gene therapy you championed is a harmful failure.

The hysterical propaganda according to which "vaccines saved humanity" is pushing me towards rejecting all vaccination because its proponents keep lying.

Yes there are several vaccines that reliably immunise the recipient for a low risk of mild to severe effects that make the risk worth it shall the person wish to tale it. Like all treatments, there are varying risks and benefits for each of them.

Some that were routine turned-out to be totally useless on follow-up studied because their "efficacy" was an accidental correlation to improved life conditions, like the anti-tubercukosos vaccine. It dosen't work. It's being discontinued all over the world as each country's "experts" reluctantly admit they were wrong and it dosen't immunize, dosen't reduce transmission and dosen't improve outcomes when taking a step back and having better studies. ( Sounds familiar? )

Childhood mortality started sharply falling before vaccination, and humanity was steadily increasing in numbers before the vaccines. Why? Better hygene, more and better food, antibiotics, etc.

When you push agressively for systematic chickenpox vaccine, which loses its immunity effect after a few years, I'm out. Infection grants lifelong immunity. The virus is never going away because the vaccine fails too often. Post natural-immunity exposure is protective against shingles.

Vaccinating children against chickenpox creates an oppprtunity for adult and senior checkenpox infections.

It should have been reserved for high-risk children, period. But you can't accept that. Submission to every vaccine must be total or the black sheep is a "dirty antivaxer".

So I will become the "anti-vaxer" because you have to be stopped before you kill more people with vaxcultist sledgehammer public health mandates.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The gene therapy you championed is a harmful failure.

The hysterical propaganda according to which "vaccines saved humanity" is pushing me towards rejecting all vaccination because its proponents keep lying.

Yes there are several vaccines that reliably immunise the recipient for a low risk of mild to severe effects that make the risk worth it shall the person wish to tale it. Like all treatments, there are varying risks and benefits for each of them.

Some that were routine turned-out to bemtotally useless on follow-up studied because their "efficacy" was an accidental correlation to improved life conditions, like the anti-tubercukosos vaccine. It dosen't work. It's being discontinued all over the world as each country's "experts" reluctantly admit they were wrong and it dosen't immunize, dosen't reduce transmission and dosen't improve outcomes when taking a step back and having better studies. ( Sounds familiar? )

Childhood mortality started sharply falling before vaccination, and humanity was steadily increasing in numbers before the vaccines. Why? Better hygene, more and better food, antibiotics, etc.

When you push agressively for systematic chickenpox vaccine, which loses its immunity effect after a few years, I'm out. Infection grants lifelong immunity. The virus is never going away because the vaccine fails too often. Post natural-immunity exposure is protective against shingles.

Vaccinating children against chickenpox creates an oppprtunity for adult and senior checkenpox infections.

It should have been reserved for high-risk children, period. But you can't accept that. Submission to every vaccine must be total or the black sheep is a "dirty antivaxer".

So I will become the "anti-vaxer" because you have to be stopped before you kill more people with vaxcultist sledgehammer public health mandates.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The gene therapy you championed is a harmful failure.

The hysterical propaganda according to which "vaccines saved humanity" is pushing me towards rejecting all vaccination because its proponents keep lying.

Yes there are several vaccines that reliably immunise the recipient for a low risk of side mild to severe effects.

But childhood mortality started sharply falling before vaccination, and humanity was steadily increasing in numbers before the vaccines. Why? Better hygene, more and better food, antibiotics, etc.

When you push agressively for systematic chickenpox vaccine, which loses its immunity effect after a few years, I'm out. Infection grants lifelong immunity. The virus is never going away because the vaccine fails too often. Post natural-immunity exposure is protective against shingles.

Vaccinating children against chickenpox creates an oppprtunity for adult and senior checkenpox infections.

It should have been reserved for high-risk children, period. But you can't accept that. Submission to every vaccine must be total or the black sheep is a "dirty antivaxer".

So I will become the "anti-vaxer" because you have to be stopped before you kill more people with vaxcultist sledgehammer public health mandates.

1 year ago
1 score