If they want Crowder to get docked for demonetization they should pay him as a cut of advertisements. Where's the clause where if Crowder expands his advertisement revenue by 2x from having a great show he gets paid more?
Instead their plan is to spam ads for two years, take the lion's share of the profits, and dump him or 'renegotiate' after his audience flees. Basically a leveraged buyout; buy the company, extract all the value, then bankrupt it and move on.
It's actually much worse than I thought:
- lose 25% if advertising revenue drops 50%
- lose 25% if any "major" platform demonetizes the channel or maybe even a single video
- lose 20% if youtube bans his videos
- lose 20% if Apple bans his podcast
- lose 10% if Facebook bans his account
- lose 10% if Spotify bans his podcast
So if just Apple cancels him then he's out 45% even though Daily Wire is still making probably 95% as much as before. That's a huge risk for Crowder to take. This adds up to Crowder getting -10% of his Fee if he gets Alex Jones'd.
And that's without considering any scheming like making him read ad copy for something they know Apple will ban, for instance Daily Wire getting ad revenue from PornHub and also $25 million they don't have to pay Crowder.
If they want Crowder to get docked for demonetization then should pay him as a cut of advertisements. Where's the clause where if Crowder expands his advertisement revenue by 2x from having a great show he gets paid more?
Instead their plan is to spam ads for two years, take the lion's share of the profits, and dump him or 'renegotiate' after his audience flees. Basically a leveraged buyout; buy the company, extract all the value, then bankrupt it and move on.
It's actually much worse than I thought:
- lose 25% if advertising revenue drops 50%
- lose 25% if any "major" platform demonetizes the channel or maybe even a single video
- lose 20% if youtube bans his videos
- lose 20% if Apple bans his podcast
- lose 10% if Facebook bans his account
- lose 10% if Spotify bans his podcast
So if just Apple cancels him then he's out 45% even though Daily Wire is still making probably 95% as much as before. That's a huge risk for Crowder to take. This adds up to Crowder getting -10% of his Fee if he gets Alex Jones'd.
And that's without considering any scheming like making him read ad copy for something they know Apple will ban, for instance Daily Wire getting ad revenue from PornHub and also $25 million they don't have to pay Crowder.
If they want Crowder to get docked for demonetization then should pay him as a cut of advertisements. Where's the clause where if Crowder expands his advertisement revenue by 2x from having a great show he gets paid more?
Instead their plan is to spam ads for two years, take the lion's share of the profits, and dump him or 'renegotiate' after his audience flees. Basically a leveraged buyout; buy the company, extract all the value, then bankrupt it and move on.
It's actually much worse than I thought:
- lose 25% if advertising revenue drops 50%
- lose 25% if any "major" platform demonetizes the channel or maybe even a single video
- lose 20% if youtube bans his videos
- lose 20% if Apple bans his podcast
- lose 10% if Facebook bans his account
- lose 10% if Spotify bans his podcast
So if just Apple cancels him then he's out 45% even though Daily Wire is still making probably 95% as much as before. That's a huge risk for Crowder to take. This ads up to Crowder getting -10% of his Fee if he gets Alex Jones'd.
And that's without considering any scheming like making him read ad copy for something they know Apple will ban, for instance Daily Wire getting ad revenue from PornHub and also $25 million they don't have to pay Crowder.
If they want Crowder to get docked for demonetization then should pay him as a cut of advertisements. Where's the clause where if Crowder expands his advertisement revenue by 2x from having a great show he gets paid more?
Instead their plan is to spam ads for two years, take the lion's share of the profits, and dump him or 'renegotiate' after his audience flees. Basically a leveraged buyout; buy the company, extract all the value, then bankrupt it and move on.