If the contracts between the same companies and talking heads get dolled up, will you wave the ol MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner? Reform would be a fraudulent and meaningless gesture. Any concessions made to signers would not hold for long, no matter how purely aesthetic they were to begin with.

The answer is to sever these businesses from "voice" because they have revealed their intent and it is hostile to us. Let genuine people who buy into their pipeline be transitioned into grifters and enjoy that life. The danger is in embracing and working not even with, but under our own glowing fifth column de-escalation handler nannies. All for the dangling carrot of muh exposure. The reason it is dangerous is because these people suck in and ruin potential leaders. Drag them through the dirt with diehard lifelong grifters, bonk em on the head on posture them as little employees for the public to see... I am manually stopping myself from typing more: NOW

PSYCH

We should be shaming every participant as hard as possible for not being indie. Signing a contract with these agenda driven "news orgs" after building up a personal career is basically being a scab. Like scab working during a strike, except it's not a strike to improve working conditions in a warehouse, it's a extracorporate strike over the condition of private and govt entities' authority over an individual's speech. People signing on board with them should be made to live out their career cycle in an environment of public shame.

If the contracts between the same companies and talking heads get dolled up, will you wave the ol MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner? Reform would be a fraudulent and meaningless gesture. Any concessions made to signers would not hold for long, no matter how purely aesthetic they were to begin with.

The answer is to sever these businesses from "voice" because they have revealed their intent and it is hostile to us. Let genuine people who buy into their pipeline be transitioned into grifters and enjoy that life. The danger is in embracing and working not even with, but under our own glowing fifth column de-escalation nanny handlers. All for the dangling carrot of muh exposure. The reason it is dangerous is because these people suck in and ruin potential leaders. Drag them through the dirt with diehard lifelong grifters, bonk em on the head on posture them as little employees for the public to see... I am manually stopping myself from typing more: NOW

PSYCH

We should be shaming every participant as hard as possible for not being indie. Signing a contract with these agenda driven "news orgs" after building up a personal career is basically being a scab. Like scab working during a strike, except it's not a strike to improve working conditions in a warehouse, it's a extracorporate strike over the condition of private and govt entities' authority over an individual's speech. People signing on board with them should be made to live out their career cycle in an environment of public shame.

If the contracts between the same companies and talking heads get dolled up, will you wave the ol MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner? Reform would be a fraudulent and meaningless gesture. Any concessions made to signers would not hold for long, no matter how purely aesthetic they were to begin with.

The answer is to sever these businesses from "voice" because they have revealed their intent and it is hostile to us. Let genuine people who buy into their pipeline be transitioned into grifters and enjoy that life. The danger is in embracing and working not even with, but under) our own glowing fifth column de-escalation nannies. All for the dangling carrot of muh exposure. The reason it is dangerous is because these people suck in and ruin potential leaders. Drag them through the dirt with diehard lifelong grifters, bonk em on the head on posture them as little employees for the public to see... I am manually stopping myself from typing more: NOW

PSYCH

We should be shaming every participant as hard as possible for not being indie. Signing a contract with these agenda driven "news orgs" after building up a personal career is basically being a scab. Like scab working during a strike, except it's not a strike to improve working conditions in a warehouse, it's a extracorporate strike over the condition of private and govt entities' authority over an individual's speech. People signing on board with them should be made to live out their career cycle in an environment of public shame.

If the contracts between the same companies and talking head thought-distributors get dolled up will you wave the ol MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner? Reform would be a fraudulent and meaningless gesture. Any concessions made to signers would not hold for long, no matter how purely aesthetic they were to begin with.

The answer is to sever these businesses from "voice" because they have revealed their intent and it is hostile to us. Let genuine people who buy into their pipeline be transitioned into grifters and enjoy that life. The danger is in embracing and working not even with, but under) our own glowing fifth column de-escalation nannies. All for the dangling carrot of muh exposure. The reason it is dangerous is because these people suck in and ruin potential leaders. Drag them through the dirt with diehard lifelong grifters, bonk em on the head on posture them as little employees for the public to see... I am manually stopping myself from typing more: NOW

PSYCH

We should be shaming every participant as hard as possible for not being indie. Signing a contract with these agenda driven "news orgs" after building up a personal career is basically being a scab. Like scab working during a strike, except it's not a strike to improve working conditions in a warehouse, it's a extracorporate strike over the condition of private and govt entities' authority over an individual's speech. People signing on board with them should be made to live out their career cycle in an environment of public shame.

If the contracts between the same companies and talking head thought-distributors get dolled up will you wave the ol MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner? Reform would be a fraudulent and meaningless gesture. Any concessions made to signers would not hold for long, no matter how purely aesthetic they were to begin with.

The answer is to sever these businesses from "voice" because they have revealed their intent and it is hostile to us. Let genuine people who buy into their pipeline be transitioned into grifters and enjoy that life. The danger is in embracing and working not even "with" but "under" our own glowing fifth column de-escalation nannies, for muh exposure. The reason it is dangerous is because these people suck in and ruin potential leaders. Drag them through the dirt with diehard lifelong grifters, bonk em on the head on posture them as little employees for the public to see... I am manually stopping myself from typing more: NOW