Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given on its own, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but I reiterate, no one infringed upon you or asked for your help. The amount of kvetching your discord group does over this is priceless.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given on its own, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, and I reiterate, no one infringed upon you or asked for your help. The amount of kvetching your discord group does over this is priceless.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given on its own, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know - and I reiterate, no one infringed upon you or asked for your help. The amount of kvetching your discord group does over this is priceless.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given on its own, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know - and I reiterate, no one infringed upon you or asked for your help.. The amount of kvetching your discord group does over this is priceless.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given on its own, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know. The amount of kvetching your discord group does over this is priceless.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given on its own, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy, I ain't looking for reddit gold.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this. Keep downvoting pussy.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given, not only that but no one is asking for your support? Perhaps the argument can be made that it should concern you from my own perspective, but no one has come here asking for it as far as I know.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given, not only that but no one is asking for your support?

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. Protecting your intellectual property is very different from the examples given.

And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit on this.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard. And again with the HURRRRR HANDSHAKE GOYS! I already slapped your shit.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

Its called being consistent

It's called a false equivalency. Retard.

Retard, support everyone or support no-one.

It's called a false equivalency. Retard.