Assuming the article is accurate, this shows how ridiculous the notion that a tribe/community only needs a few men to survive because the women are the reproductive bottleneck (this notion is used by many including many non-feminist men to justify male disposability and justify gynocentrism). Such a tribe gets wiped out by a tribe with more men. Reproduction is far from the only matter of importance when it comes to human communities. In almost any matter apart from reproduction, men are more valuable than women, so when it comes to survival in competition with other communities, a tribe allowing their men to mostly die out is a disaster that usually leads to extinction.

Assuming the article is accurate, this shows how ridiculous the notion that a tribe/community only needs a few men to survive because the women are the reproductive bottleneck (this notion is used by many including many non-feminist men to justify male disposability). Such a tribe gets wiped out by a tribe with more men. Reproduction is far from the only matter of importance when it comes to human communities. In almost any matter apart from reproduction, men are more valuable than women, so when it comes to survival in competition with other communities, a tribe allowing their men to mostly die out is a disaster.

Assuming the article is accurate, this shows how ridiculous the notion that a tribe/community only needs a few men to survive because the women are the reproductive bottleneck (this notion is used by many including many non-feminist men to justify male disposability). Such a tribe gets wiped out by a tribe with more men. Reproduction is far from the only matter of importance when it comes to human communities, and it almost any matter apart from reproduction, men are more valuable than women, so to compete with other communities, allowing their men to mostly die out is a disaster.