Because it's a good fucking argument, idiot. That was the second part, which if you answer "no" to the first part, you do so for a reason. That reason, which you deleted, was the point, which was that you recognize that by answering, you acknowledge that there are such things as danger signs, and if you had to actually put skin in the game, you would abide by danger signs that a paramecium could detect. Or, you wouldn't. This would identify you as having rudimentary decency or at least a baseline desire to protect your own children, or as being a child-fucker.

I'm sorry, was this exercise so tough for you that you had to delete the operative part before you felt comfortable chiming in?

Because it's a good fucking argument, idiot. That was the second part, which if you answer "no" to the first part, you do so for a reason. That reason, which you deleted, was the point, which was that you recognize that by answering, that there are such things as danger signs, and if you had to actually put skin in the game, you would abide by danger signs that a paramecium could detect.

I'm sorry, was this exercise so tough for you that you had to delete the operative part before you felt comfortable chiming in?