Bruh I am triggered. I wish Americans were whatever made it less likely to be short on meat and dairy. If that meant we were violent or that we were slaves, that wouldn't be my fault for wanting to eat meat as much as possible just like 99% of people in all societies in all of human history have wanted. An acceptable "deal" includes the meat.
There is NO flipping that on its ass, no jedish mind trick, no crap on the tv, no twitter trend, no fucking hurricane, no tOtAlLy mysterious fire, no hardcore neo-stazi action, no suddenly dieded Epsteins, nothing, there's nothing at all in the world that'll make Americans feel in the wrong for wanting meat.
Same goes for home ownership. The goalpost that was "success" from the Greatest to the Boomer generations has shifted to homeownership. It is even more important in our psyches than ever at a time when institutional forces are clusterraping the rate of homeownership. That puts a lot of pressure on one market, to almost singlehandedly maintain the illusion of social mobility as a possible outcome of work and ingenuity while it is actually not happening? Wanna guess how the math works on that?
And while Im on an over 9000 rant I might as well go for a home run and get it all out. I think privacy in general will become a Hard Issue with upper case letters so you know it's Some Actual Shit or SAS for short, just like food and homeownership.
The 4th is so laughably straightforward and violated, and intentionally misinterpreted and left outdated. One of the least mysterious pieces of legal shit a 21st century high fiction consumer could read. Imagine feeling confused about this;
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It says "papers", and looky-ho, a unified class of entities say... GO PAPERLESS lol BUY A SMORTPHONE LULZ. Suddenly, because we are talking "data" (data which, in the living memory of all baby boomers alive, was printed on PAPER) this means we are not talking "papers" anymore of course, which means POOF goodbye to that part of the Bill of Rights, bye bye. Don't worry, we don't UnMaSk you so go ahead and rela- HA GOTCHA WE UNMASKING ALL YOU TERRRREST MUFUGGAS HA, SUCK IT.
Nor are we talking "effects" anymore, nope, it's data now and yeah, you consciously agreed to let us suck it from you like blood, so we are morally blameless, you see?
Oh but looky here, the definition of "warrant" includes allllll sooorts of electromitronical communidoohickeys. "Data", wha? STFU there's no data, and also we own this data so GTFO. Yes they E-signed the oath in the warrant submission form thru the portal on the mobile thingy in the squad car. Dummy, they perfectly described what to search, see right here it's got your name and address, how much more specific can you get, SHEESH.
And if you didn't want us to have probable cause to do, like, whatever it was we did lulz, maybe you should have like, tried not having any opinions? Bam another right bites the dust. Yknow what we at the agency say boys, "if you can't amend em, apprehend em!" I swear one day this is gonna go full on SAS so fast, all it takes is one psychopath with a loosh leash at Google or a contractor group of some sort and no one will ever blink at the topic of food breaking down into a rant about a man's favorite seemingly non food-related rights.
These are all things specifically targeted. I have never felt so threatened by a threat to a "right" than I do by this talk about access to meat, for which I'm totally dependent on others. It really locks in the WEF scheme into a unified narrative of sorts concerning other changes, especially in the realm of ownership, social mobility, and privacy. All that stuff is hoity toity but unfortunately for them it includes (unnegotiably) the matter of food and that is simple, direct and tactile to us all. It connects the dots from philosophical, political discussion, to the actual practice of our lives, compulsorily, and including everyone who never let the hoity toity stuff affect their lives. Bc it's THE FOOD.
PHEW
Bruh I am triggered. I wish Americans were whatever made it less likely to be short on meat and dairy. If that meant we were violent or that we were slaves, that wouldn't be my fault for wanting to eat meat as much as possible just like 99% of people in all societies in all of human history have wanted. An acceptable "deal" includes the meat.
There is NO flipping that on its ass, no jedish mind trick, no crap on the tv, no twitter trend, no fucking hurricane, no tOtAlLy mysterious fire, no hardcore neo-stazi action, no suddenly dieded Epsteins, nothing, there's nothing at all in the world that'll make Americans feel in the wrong for wanting meat.
Same goes for home ownership. The goalpost that was "success" from the Greatest to the Boomer generations has shifted to homeownership. It is even more important in our psyches than ever at a time when institutional forces are clusterraping the rate of homeownership. That's most important of all, bc it at least the illusion of social mobility as a possible outcome of work and ingenuity.
And while Im on an over 9000 rant I might as well go for a home run and get it all out. I think privacy in general will become a Hard Issue with upper case letters so you know it's Some Actual Shit or SAS for short.
The 4th is so laughably straightforward and violated, and intentionally misinterpreted and left outdated. One of the least mysterious pieces of legal shit a 21st century high fiction consumer could read. Imagine feeling confused about this;
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It says "papers", and looky-ho, a unified class of entities say... GO PAPERLESS lol BUY A SMORTPHONE LULZ. Suddenly, because we are talking "data" (data which, in the living memory of all baby boomers alive, was printed on PAPER) this means we are not talking "papers" anymore of course, which means POOF goodbye to that part of the Bill of Rights, bye bye. Don't worry, we don't UnMaSk you so go ahead and rela- HA GOTCHA WE UNMASKING ALL YOU TERRRREST MUFUGGAS HA, SUCK IT.
Nor are we talking "effects" anymore, nope, it's data now and yeah, you consciously agreed to let us suck it from you like blood, so we are morally blameless, you see?
Oh but looky here, the definition of "warrant" includes allllll sooorts of electromitronical communidoohickeys. "Data", wha? STFU there's no data, and also we own this data so GTFO. Yes they E-signed the oath in the warrant submission form thru the portal on the mobile thingy in the squad car. Dummy, they perfectly described what to search, see right here it's got your name and address, how much more specific can you get, SHEESH.
And if you didn't want us to have probable cause to do, like, whatever it was we did lulz, maybe you should have like, tried not having any opinions? Bam another right bites the dust. Yknow what we at the agency say boys, "if you can't amend em, apprehend em!" I swear one day this is gonna go full on SAS so fast, all it takes is one psychopath with a loosh leash at Google or a contractor group of some sort and no one will ever blink at the topic of food breaking down into a rant about a man's favorite seemingly non food-related rights.
These are all things specifically targeted. I have never felt so threatened by a threat to a "right" than I do by this talk about access to meat, for which I'm totally dependent on others. It really locks in the WEF scheme into a unified narrative of sorts concerning other changes, especially in the realm of ownership, social mobility, and privacy. All that stuff is hoity toity but unfortunately for them it includes (unnegotiably) the matter of food and that is simple, direct and tactile to us all. It connects the dots from philosophical, political discussion, to the actual practice of our lives, compulsorily, and including everyone who never let the hoity toity stuff affect their lives. Bc it's THE FOOD.
PHEW
Bruh I am triggered. I wish Americans were whatever made it less likely to be short on meat and dairy. If that meant we were violent or that we were slaves, that wouldn't be my fault for wanting to eat meat as much as possible just like 99% of people in all societies in all of human history have wanted. An acceptable "deal" includes the meat.
There is NO flipping that on its ass, no jedish mind trick, no crap on the tv, no twitter trend, no fucking hurricane, no tOtAlLy mysterious fire, no hardcore neo-stazi action, no suddenly dieded Epsteins, nothing, there's nothing at all in the world that'll make Americans feel in the wrong for wanting meat.
Same goes for home ownership. The goalpost that was "success" from the Greatest to the Boomer generations has shifted to homeownership. It is even more important in our psyches than ever at a time when institutional forces are clusterraping the rate of homeownership. That's most important of all, bc it at least the illusion of social mobility as a possible outcome of work and ingenuity.
And while Im on an over 9000 rant I might as well go for a home run and get it all out. I think privacy in general will become a Hard Issue with upper case letters so you know it's Some Actual Shit or SAS for short.
The 4th is so laughably straightforward and violated, and intentionally misinterpreted and left outdated. One of the least mysterious pieces of legal shit a 21st century high fiction consumer could read. Imagine feeling confused about this;
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It says "papers", and looky-ho, a unified class of entities say... GO PAPERLESS lol BUY A SMORTPHONE LULZ. Suddenly, because we are talking "data" (data which, in the living memory of all baby boomers alive, was printed on PAPER) this means we are not talking "papers" anymore of course, which means POOF goodbye to that part of the Bill of Rights, bye bye. Don't worry, we don't UnMaSk you so go ahead and rela- HA GOTCHA WE UNMASKING ALL YOU TERRRREST MUFUGGAS HA, SUCK IT.
Nor are we talking "effects" anymore, nope, it's data now and yeah, you consciously agreed to let us suck it from you like blood, so we are morally blameless, you see?
Oh but looky here, the definition of "warrant" includes allllll sooorts of electromitronical communidoohickeys. "Data", wha? STFU there's no data, and also we own this data so GTFO. Yes they E-signed the oath in the warrant submission form thru the portal on the mobile thingy in the squad car. Dummy, they perfectly described what to search, see right here it's got your name and address, how much more specific can you get, SHEESH.
And if you didn't want us to have probable cause to do, like, whatever it was we did lulz, maybe you should have like, tried not having any opinions? Bam another right bites the dust. Yknow what we at the agency say boys, "if you can't amend em, apprehend em!" I swear one day this is gonna go full on SAS so fast, all it takes is one psychopath with a loosh leash at Google or a contractor group of some sort and no one will ever blink at the topic of food breaking down into a rant about a man's favorite seemingly non food-related rights.
PHEW