and found that men with high misogyny scores were more likely to be unemployed.
And this is something they do themselves?
The whole article is typical More Feminine Way tripe, complete with ridiculous logic (Pulse was anti-woman) and very, very thinly veiled ideas that men are inherently defective.
I focus in on this line because it's the typical lying with statistics they're so famous for.
So, the first argument they will likely present here is that it's self-sabotage. That they can't control their hatred long enough to keep a job. I don't believe that to be the case, I'm known here for my strong opinions on women, but I can moderate them enough to stay employable.
I would suggest that it's more likely that their "misogyny" came not from deeply held political beliefs, but from basic observation of who is succeeding and who isn't. When you're struggling to live and you see women exploiting men through things like OnlyFans to earn enough money to buy and sell your entire life, only a robot wouldn't feel that slight hatred towards those people. Women fail upwards and it's clear in every facet of working life. Merit doesn't explain their sudden success, and the deeper you dig, the sicker the system seems to be.
I could go on about the system, how it kneecaps everyone male from their first day of school to even their day of death, but I think I've already been through that enough. I'll TL;DR it for clarity of where I'm going.
A baby is born male and instantly pushed into a society that hates that part of his identity. The teachers do everything to suppress it, up to putting him on drugs with questionable long term effects that "aid focus". Then if he gets out of that, he has to look forward to way higher standards expected for the same goals as his female peers. If they need a 3.0, he needs 3.7 - 3.8. Even after graduating, it's clear that the employment market favors women. Even if he achieves everything and becomes fairly well off, all he can spend the money on is companies that favor the group that he fought so hard to get above the hurdles that they placed on him.
But even all that, is still not enough misery for us. Women continue to push for worse and worse treatment of men, and their votes always move towards that. They are the only demographic that continue to move towards the Democratic Party, because it promised them further discrimination against men.
Even if I'm wrong that feminists truly act to reduce the male population and this informs all of their actions, the eagerness to disarm men, combined with the type of policy that feminists have pushed for in other countries, makes me confident to say that the reason they want you disarmed is because they want to hurt you.
I really hate the redesign of this site. Utterly woeful and prevents long comments by not allowing the text box to scroll enough to put your text above the keyboard.
and found that men with high misogyny scores were more likely to be unemployed.
And this is something they do themselves?
The whole article is typical More Feminine Way tripe, complete with ridiculous logic (Pulse was anti-woman) and very, very thinly veiled ideas that men are inherently defective.
I focus in on this line because it's the typical lying with statistics they're so famous for.
So, the first argument they will likely present here is that it's self-sabotage. That they can't control their hatred long enough to keep a job. I don't believe that to be the case, I'm known here for my strong opinions on women, but I can moderate them enough to stay employable.
I would suggest that it's more likely that their "misogyny" came not from deeply held political beliefs, but from basic observation of who is succeeding and who isn't. When you're struggling to live and you see women exploiting men through things like OnlyFans to earn enough money to buy and sell your entire life, only a robot wouldn't feel that slight hatred towards those people. Women fail upwards and it's clear in every facet of working life. Merit doesn't explain their sudden success, and the deeper you dig, the sicker the system seems to be.
I could go on about the system, how it kneecaps everyone male from their first day of school to even their day of death, but I think I've already been through that enough. I'll TL;DR it for clarity of where I'm going.
A baby is born male and instantly pushed into a society that hates that part of his identity. The teachers do everything to suppress it, up to putting him on drugs with questionable long term effects that "aid focus". Then if he gets out of that, he has to look forward to way higher standards expected for the same goals as his female peers. If they need a 3.0, he needs 3.7 - 3.8. Even after graduating, it's clear that the employment market favors women. Even if he achieves everything and becomes fairly well off, all he can spend the money on is companies that favor the group that he fought so hard to get above the hurdles that they placed on him.
I really hate the redesign of this site. Utterly woeful and prevents long comments by not allowing the text box to scroll enough to put your text above the keyboard.
and found that men with high misogyny scores were more likely to be unemployed.
And this is something they do themselves?
The whole article is typical More Feminine Way tripe, complete with ridiculous logic (Pulse was anti-woman) and very, very thinly veiled ideas that men are inherently defective.
I focus in on this line because it's the typical lying with statistics they're so famous for.
So, the first argument they will likely present here is that it's self-sabotage. That they can't control their hatred long enough to keep a job. I don't believe that to be the case, I'm known here for my strong opinions on women, but I can moderate them enough to stay employable.
I would suggest that it's more likely that their "misogyny" came not from deeply held political beliefs, but from basic observation of who is succeeding and who isn't. When you're struggling to live and you see women exploiting men through things like OnlyFans to earn enough money to buy and sell your entire life, only a robot wouldn't feel that slight hatred towards those people. Women fail upwards and it's clear in every facet of working life. Merit doesn't explain their sudden success, and the deeper you dig, the sicker the system seems to be.
I really hate the redesign of this site. Utterly woeful and prevents long comments by not allowing the text box to scroll enough to put your text above the keyboard.