Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I think it is easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." They will morally collectivize as they see fit. But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay left leaning people to flood into your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is then too rigid for Californians to come swarming in on that Soros buck to ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst things that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I think it is easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." They will morally collectivize as they see fit. But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay left leaning people to flood into your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is then too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst things that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I think it is easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." They will morally collectivize as they see fit. But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay left leaning people to flood into your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst things that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I think it easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." They will morally collectivize as they see fit. But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay left leaning people to flood into your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst things that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I think it easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." They will morally collectivize as they see fit. But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay left leaning people to flood into your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst thing that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I think it easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." They will morally collectivize as they see fit. But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay people flood your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst thing that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I think it easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay people flood your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it. Of course they won't ever fund moving people OUT of these states for the sake of "abortion rights".

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst thing that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I think it easily reposted by suggesting not moving to a red state, "duh." But of course the leftists higher up the foodchain don't like this because not only does an appendage of their favorite money-laundering scheme die, they can't philanthropically pay people flood your counties to make pawns of your local government - the moral scaffolding is too rigid for Californians to come in on that Soros buck and ruin it.

This becoming a matter of states rights was one of the worst thing that could have happened to the left; so they lie and try to pretend that this is an attack on the very concept of abortion - which by itself is less morally and pragmatically tennable than simply having some prudence.

1 year ago
1 score