Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regulars (well to the "vacationing" regulars too), and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

It's kinda funny how much doomposting Strelkov is constantly. He may end up purged after all.

What and how "jingoistic nonsense"? The need to smash and burn own farms and factories and public buildings to reach out and touch the invaders hiding inside them?

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regulars (well to the "vacationing" regulars too), and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

What and how "jingoistic nonsense"? The need to smash and burn own farms and factories and public buildings to reach out and touch the invaders hiding inside them?

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regulars (well to the "vacationing" regulars too), and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

What and how "jingoistic nonsense"? The need to hit own farms and factories and public buildings to reach out and touch the invaders inside?

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regulars (well to the "vacationing" regulars too), and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria/amp/).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 40 new systems, tested on humans).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly falled it, testing new weapons, over 40 new systems, tested on humans).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.

What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.

You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did

We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.

Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain

The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.

They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regukars, and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.

1 year ago
1 score