Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Detention/detained implies "prevented movement"; it was wholly forestalled. Whereas Arrest/arrested implies "halted movement"; it was quashed. So the distinction is whether JP was not moving or already moving.

Physical contact just ups the tortious portion to assault (which must then be justified).

If JP was walking, he was arrested and THEN detained in one spot, without ever being assaulted... --Accurate

Something like that. Words mean things, and the left doesn't like that non-postmodern fact. So use it to annoy them, via precision. And any legal brains out there, feel free to dissect the terms better'n I did.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Detention/detained implies "prevented movement"; it was wholly forestalled. Whereas Arrest/arrested implies "halted movement"; it was quashed. So the distinction is whether JP was not moving or already moving.

Physical contact just ups the tortious portion to assault (which must then be justified).

If JP was walking, he was arrested and THEN detained in one spot, without ever being assaulted... --Accurate

Something like that. Words mean things, and the left doesn't like that non-postmodern fact. So use it to annoy them, via precision. And any legal brains out there, feel free to dissect the term better'n I did.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Detention/detained implies "prevented movement"; it was wholly forestalled. Whereas Arrest/arrested implies "halted movement"; it was quashed. So the distinction is whether JP was not moving or already moving.

Physical contact just ups the tortious portion to assault (which must then be justified).

If JP was walking, he was arrested and THEN detained in one spot, without being assaulted... --Accurate

Something like that. Words mean things, and the left doesn't like that non-postmodern fact. So use it to annoy them, via precision. And any legal brains out there, feel free to dissect the term better'n I did.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Detained implies prevented movement, where arrested implies halted movement.

So the distinction is whether JP was already moving or not. Contact just ups the tortious portion to assault (which must then be justified).

If JP was waking, he was arrested and then detained in one dpot without being assaulted...

Something like that. Words mean things, and the left doesn't like that non-postmodern fact. So use it.

And any legal brains out there, feel free to dissect the term better'n I did.

1 year ago
1 score