We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent (and ongoing, now mostly in Africa) war against the Islamic State the enemy propaganda has been suppressed very strongly on the internet with no free speech excuse.

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent and ongoing war against the Islamic State the enemy propaganda has been suppressed very strongly on the internet with no free speech excuse.

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent and ongoing war against the Islamic State the enemy propaganda has been suppressed very strongly on the internet (also by Russia) with no free speech excuse.

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent and ongoing war against the Islamic State the enemy propaganda has been suppressed very strongly on the internet (also by Russia).

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent and ongoing war against the Islamic State the enemy propaganda has been suppressed strongly on the internet (also by Russia, but not on Telegram).

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent and ongoing war against the Islamic State their propaganda has been suppressed strongly on the internet.

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. (That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird.)