How can you be this smugly wrong all the damn time?

a) SMUG, adjective - "nice; neat; affectedly nice in dress". Thanks for the compliment.

b) does nature communicate wrong information towards your perceiving senses? If so; how?

c) time aka tick; tick; tick...represents the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the perceivable balance with each one within as the center choice responding to it.

Sodom and Gamorrah aren't English words, they cannot be broken down the way you just did.

a) what came first...suggested words or perceived sound?

b) what if HE-BREW Latin into Pig-Latin (English) to deceive you from comprehending that every word suggested expresses the same perceivable origin? The etymology of all languages originates within motion; hence form (word) out of flow (sound). Yet comprehending this requires adaptation to sound (resonance) instead of ignoring it for word (dissonance).

c) cannot (can nothing) ignores that choice temporarily exists as the response to everything perceivable. So I can; you perceived that I could and responded by suggesting nothing (not want) over everything (need); when proclaiming that I cannot.

d) give me the oldest definitions of Sodom and Gomorrah and I'm gonna rip them to shreds with the same modus operandi of applying perceivable (natural law) upon suggested (contract law). The more I do this; the more I comprehend of the perceivable. What you do with this represents your free will of choice.

Why do you keep doing this shit?

If one applies FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals" as resistance (form) to velocity (flow); then one grows resistance (life) to velocity (inception towards death). It's called survival.

Question impression (perceived inspiration) to compression (comprehension of perceived) for expression (self sustenance)?

Nobody thinks you're smart.

Smart (want) vs Dumb (not want)...both suggested labels that ignore that I perceptibly existed before any label can be suggested. This of course goes for perceived over suggested as well.

From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; if I wasn't then why would I say I am?"

From my perspective: "the way (flow) I am (form)"

How can you be this smugly wrong all the damn time?

a) SMUG, adjective - "nice; neat; affectedly nice in dress". Thanks for the compliment.

b) does nature communicate wrong information towards your perceiving senses? If so; how?

c) time aka tick; tick; tick...represents the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the perceivable balance with each one within as the center choice responding to it.

Sodom and Gamorrah aren't English words, they cannot be broken down the way you just did.

a) what came first...suggested words or perceived sound?

b) what if HE-BREW Latin into Pig-Latin (English) to deceive you from comprehending that every word suggested expresses the same perceivable origin? The etymology of all languages originates within motion; hence form (word) out of flow (sound). Yet comprehending this requires adaptation to sound (resonance) instead of ignoring it for word (dissonance).

c) cannot (can nothing) ignores that choice temporarily exists as the response to everything perceivable. So I can; you perceived that I could and responded by suggesting nothing (not want) over everything (need); when proclaiming that I cannot.

d) give me the oldest definitions of Sodom and Gomorrah and I'm gonna rip them to shreds with the same modus operandi of applying perceivable (natural law) upon suggested (contract law). The more I do this; the more I comprehend of the perceivable. What you do with this represents your free will of choice.

Why do you keep doing this shit?

If one applies FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals" as resistance (form) to velocity (flow); than one grows resistance (life) to velocity (inception towards death). It's called survival.

Question impression (perceived inspiration) to compression (comprehension of perceived) for expression (self sustenance)?

Nobody thinks you're smart.

Smart (want) vs Dumb (not want)...both suggested labels that ignore that I perceptibly existed before any label can be suggested. This of course goes for perceived over suggested as well.

From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; if I wasn't then why would I say I am?"

From my perspective: "the way (flow) I am (form)"