Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Is "not killing a baby" worse than living in a war zone?

Give it up to adoption if you don't want to care for it. I am done listening to the tiny violins of people whining they can't kill their baby in the handful of Western countries where it's a crime.

I consider it should be legal to "evict" someone squating inside you, making you a horrible person for refusing to sacrifice your comfort and fee-feels a few months for soneone to get to live. How horrifying Progressives managed to brainwash half the population into being less upset at killing a baby, than they are at the perspective of giving it up to adoption.

But your right to body autonomy superceeds someone else needing to leech inside you to survive. You owe nobody your blood donations, your left kidney, a bone marrow sample, etc.

You don't want to let that person squat a few months and rather remove it, which will kill it? Especially if this person exists there because you chose to have sex? Disgusting. But it's your call because it's your body that's been squated.

"But muh rape" THE BABY DIDN'T RAPE YOU. YOU DON'T GET TO KILL A THIRD PARTY AND WAIVE THE MORAL ANGUISH OF KILLING BECAUSE OF A RAPE.

My God, these amoral degenerates argue like psychopaths.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Is "not killing a baby" worse than living in a war zone?

Give it up to adoption if you don't want to care for it. I am done listening to the tiny violins of people whining they can't kill their baby in the handful of Western countries where it's a crime.

I consider it should be legal to "evict" someone squating inside you, making you a horrible person for refusing to sacrifice your comfort and fee-feels a few months for soneone to get to live. How horrifying Progressives managed to brainwash half the population into being less upset at killing a baby, than they are at the perspective of giving it up to adoption.

But your right to body autonomy superceeds someone else needing to leech inside you to survive. You owe nobody your blood donations, your left kidney, a bone marrow sample, etc.

You don't want to let that person squat a few months and rather remove it, which will kill it? Especially if thisnperson exists there because you chose to have sex? Disgusting. But it's your call because it's your body that's been squated.

"But muh rape" THE BABY DIDN'T RAPE YOU. YOU DON'T GET TO KILL A THIRD PARTY AND WAIVE THE MORAL ANGUISH OF KILLING BECAUSE OF A RAPE.

My God, these amoral degenerates argue like psychopaths.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Is "not killing a baby" worse than living in a war zone?

Give it up to adoption if you don't want to care for it. I am done listening to the tiny violins of people whining they can't kill their baby in the handful of Western countries where it's a crime.

I consider it should be legal to "evict" someone squating inside you, making you a horrible person for refusing to sacrifice your comfort and fee-feels a few months for soneone to get to live. How horrifying Progressives managed to brainwash half the population into being less upset at killing a baby, than they are at the perspective of giving it up to adoption.

But your right to body autonomy superceeds someone else needing to leech inside you to survive. You owe nobody your blood donations, your left kidney, a bone marrow sample, etc.

You don't want to let that person squat a few months and rather remove it, which will kill it? Disgusting. But it's your call because it's your body that's been squated.

"But muh rape" THE BABY DIDN'T RAPE YOU. YOU DON'T GET TO KILL A THIRD PARTY AND WAIVE THE MORAL ANGUISH OF KILLING BECAUSE OF A RAPE.

My God, these amoral degenerates argue like psychopaths.

2 years ago
1 score