Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Young people should NOT get the vaccines by default.

Natural immunity is vastly superior and give a population-wide heterogenous defense, because natural response from different people will develop in slightly different ways.

This means viruses can't simply mutate a bit and sweep through an immunogically near-identical vaccinated population after evading vaccination. Suceptibility to reinfection will thus be time delayed at much larger intervals thst won't coincide between people.

Thus "flattening the curve". The whole fucking point the "experts" argued we had to surrender our human rights to abide by their lockdowns.

A small % of young people with specific risk factors may benefit. I'm not an anti-vax, but an anti-mass-hysteria.

Oh and the "omicron vaccine" being developped right now? It won't give lasting immunity either. Also Omicron already is on its way out. And as shown with the vax debacle, with a highly-contagious coronavirus, mutations will be selected to bypass vaccination in a matter of months if you vaccinate a high % of people.

Want your vaccines to work at least one fucking flu season? Only vaccinate people at high risk, so the dominating strain isn't selected specifically to evade your vaccine.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Young people should NOT get the vaccines by default.

Natural immunity is vastly superior and give a population-wide heterogenous defense, because natural response from different people will develop in slightly different ways.

This means viruses can't simply mutate a bit and sweep through an immunogically near-identical vaccinated population after evading vaccination. Suceptibility to reinfection will thus be time delayed at much larger intervals thst won't coincide between people.

Thus "flattening the curve". The whole fucking point the "experts" argued we had to surrender our human rights to abide by their lockdowns.

A small % of young people with specific risk factors may benefit. I'm not an anti-vax, but an anti-mass-hysteria.

Oh and the "omicron vaccine" being developped right now? It won't give lasting immunity either. Also Omicron already is on its way out. And as shown with the vax debacle, a highly-contagious coronaviruses mutations will be selected to bypass vaccination in a matter of months if you vaccinate a high % of people.

Want your vaccines to work at least one fucking flu season? Only vaccinate people at high risk, so the dominating strain isn't selected specifically to evade your vaccine.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Young people should NOT get the vaccines by default.

Natural immunity is vastly superior and give a population-wide heterogenous defense, because natural response from different people will develop in slightly different ways.

This means viruses can't simply mutate a bit and sweep through an immunogically near-identical vaccinated population after evading vaccination. Suceptibility to reinfection will thus be time delayed at much larger intervals thst won't coincide between people.

Thus "flattening the curve". The who,e fucking point the "experts" argued we had to surrender our human rights to abide by their lockdowns.

A small % of young people with specific risk factors may benefit. I'm not an anti-vax, but an anti-mass-hysteria.

Oh and the "omicron vaccine" being developped right now? It won't give lasting immunity either. Also Omicron already is on its way out. And as shown with the vax debacle, a highly-contagious coronaviruses mutations will be selected to bypass vaccination in a matter of months if you vaccinate a high % of people.

Want your vaccines to work at least one fucking flu season? Only vaccinate people at high risk, so the dominating strain isn't selected specifically to evade your vaccine.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Young people should NOT get the vaccines by default.

Natural immunity is vastly superior and give a population-wide heterogenous defense, because natural response from different people will develop in slightly different ways.

This means viruses can't simply mutate a bit and sweep through an immunogically near-identical vaccinated population. Suceptibility to reinfection will thus be time delayed at much larger intervals thst won't coincide between people.

Thus "flattening the curve". The who,e fucking point the "experts" argued we had to surrender our human rights to abide by their lockdowns.

A small % of young people with specific risk factors may benefit. I'm not an anti-vax, but an anti-mass-hysteria.

2 years ago
1 score