Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Fixed a typo

It's satire because they are using the same arguments the right makes, the difference being the right believes what it is saying the left are trying to score points and belittle the right.

Wrong. The Left obviously believes this is true which is why the game they used in their "satirical" post is literally about lesbians trying to survive against bigotry in an apocalyptic setting where humanity is on the brink of extinction.

In this case, the Right are 100% right, because TLOU2 makes no narrative sense at all. Why are we rooting for genetic dead-ends? Why should we care about two degenerate lesbians raising a kid where they're only contributing to humanity's demise?

The "satire" in that Reddit post is asinine because heterosexual relationships in a setting like The Last of Us is the ONLY WAY humanity survives.

I suspect it was Bruce Strayley and not Neil Druckmann who offered a more "hopeful" ending to the first game where it looked like Joel would be helping to raise Ellie in that little commune; it gave the impression she could grow up, get married, have kids, and at least provide immunity to the strain that way since Joel opted to forfeit any chance of using her DNA to create a vaccine.

The second game throws that hope completely out the window by focusing on a homosexual relationship where Ellie won't be passing her immunity own through hereditary means, and CAN'T save humanity any other way.

Ultimately it's an ignorant comment even as "satire" because ALL of the criticisms leveled at TLOU2 for being degenerate faggot propaganda were true. It didn't even make narrative sense to the world they built, and in the end it had nothing to do with "love", like Druckmann said, it was futile nihilism, since the two lesbos wouldn't be able to do much but finger-bang themselves to death while leaving nothing behind to help sustain the human species.

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

It's satire because they are using the same arguments the right makes, the difference being the right believes what it is saying the left are trying to score points and belittle the right.

Wrong. The Left obviously believes this is true which is why the game they used in their "satirical" post is literally about lesbians trying to survive against bigotry in an apocalyptic setting where humanity is on the brink of extinction.

In this case, the Right are 100% right, because TLOU2 makes no narrative sense at all. Why are we rooting for genetic dead-ends? Why should we care about two degenerate lesbians raising a kid where they're only contributing to humanity's demise?

The "satire" in that Reddit post is asinine because heterosexual relationships in a setting like The Last of Us is the ONLY WAY humanity survives.

I suspect it was Bruce Strayley and not Neil Druckmann who offered a more "hopeful" ending to the first game where it looked like Joel would be helping to raise Ellie in that little commune; it gave the impression she could grow up, get married, have kids, and at least provide immunity to the strain that way since Joel opted to forfeit any chance of using her DNA to create a vaccine.

The second game throws that hope completely out the window by focusing on a homosexual relationship where Ellie won't be passing her immunity own through hereditary means, and CAN'T save humanity any other way.

Ultimately it's an ignorant comment even as "satire" because ALL of the criticisms leveled at TLOU2 for being degenerate faggot propaganda was true. It didn't even make narrative sense to the world they built, and in the end it had nothing to do with "love", like Druckmann said, it was futile nihilism, since the two lesbos wouldn't be able to do much but finger-bang themselves to death while living nothing behind to help sustain the human species.

2 years ago
1 score