Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Black certainly checked yes because he would have been denied otherwise. It's also not inappropriate because the gun was being transferred to Dominick as a trustee. Buying a gun on behalf of someone underaged and holding onto it until they are old enough for ownership to be transferred is 100% legal. It's called a trust and that can be established purely based on an oral agreement even if the exact legal verbiage was never used.

Other than Rittenhouse littering by dropping 400 lbs of trash on the street, neither Dominick Black nor Kyle Rittenhouse did anything illegal.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

He certainly checked yes because he would have been denied otherwise. It's also not inappropriate because the gun was being transferred to him as a trustee. Buying a gun on behalf of someone underaged and holding onto it until they are old enough for ownership to be transferred is 100% legal. It's called a trust and that can be established purely based on an oral agreement even if the exact legal verbiage was never used.

Other than Rittenhouse littering by dropping 400 lbs of trash on the street, neither Dominick Black nor Kyle Rittenhouse did anything illegal.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

He certainly checked yes because he would have been denies otherwise. It's also not inappropriate because the gun was being transferred to him as a trustee. Buying a gun on behalf of someone underaged and holding onto it until they are old enough for ownership to be transferred is 100% legal. It's called a trust and that can be established purely based on an oral agreement even if the exact legal verbiage was never used.

Other than Rittenhouse littering by dropping 400 lbs of trash on the street, neither Dominick Black nor Kyle Rittenhouse did anything illegal.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

He certainly checked yes because he would have been denies otherwise. It's also not inappropriate because the gun was being transferred to him as a trustee. Buying a gun on behalf of someone underaged and holding onto it until they are old enough for ownership to be transferred is 100% legal. It's called a trust and that can be established purely based on an oral agreement even if the exact legal verbiage was never used.

2 years ago
1 score