The problem with libertarianism is that it cannot defend its population from subversion. There are people and groups who do not care about money and cannot be persuaded, they will destroy a society that is totally reliant on praxeology and debate to change people's minds. The reason marxism gets off the ground is that it removes any dissenting opinions first. Libertarianism presupposes those who are ideologically opposed to them are non existent. Plato (maybe Aristotle) even talked about how a society had to be culturally (racially) homogeneous or it would eat itself alive (weimerica), and that was assuming that the government's authority to physically remove subversives was a given.

Without a sterile, ready-made society, a libertarian state would be immediately subverted by the Soroses of the world. The reason it worked back in the 1700s, was because they had culturally homogeneous society, where in people had a strong sense of morality, social obligation, and personal responsibility; their leaders were not corrupt corporate puppets, and had the best interests of the people in mind. That doesn't exist anymore. People do not have what it takes for actual libertarianism, it's a pipe dream that requires an authoritarian state to proceed it in order to prepare/defend the people.

The problem with libertarianism is that it cannot defend its population from subversion. There are people and groups who do not care about money and cannot be persuaded, they will destroy a society that is totally reliant on praxeology and debate to change people's minds. The reason marxism gets off the ground is that it removes any dissenting opinions first. Libertarianism presupposes those who are ideologically opposed to them are non existent. Plato (maybe Aristotle) even talked about how a society had to be culturally (racially) homogeneous or it would eat itself alive (weimerica), and that was assuming the government's authority to physically remove subversives was a given.

Without a sterile, ready-made society, libertarian states would be immediately subverted by the Soroses of the world. The reason it worked back in the 1700s, was because they had culturally homogeneous society where in people had a strong sense of morality, social obligation, and personal responsibility; their leaders were not corrupt corporate puppets, and had the best interests of the people in mind. That doesn't exist anymore. People do not have what it takes for actual libertarianism, it's a pipe dream that requires an authoritarian state to proceed it and prepare/defend the people.