Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? Changing entire definitions of words under our noses? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship tacked on. I can't even talk about this shit with my family. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable conversation" would be a FANTASTIC change of pace from someone out there trying to essentially destroy our lives for not capitulating to their shady shit.

2 years ago
7 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? Changing entire definitions of words under our noses? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship. I can't even talk about this shit with my family. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable conversation" would be a FANTASTIC change of pace from someone out there trying to essentially destroy our lives for not capitulating to their shady shit.

2 years ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship. I can't even talk about this shit with my family. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable conversation" would be a FANTASTIC change of pace from someone out there trying to essentially destroy our lives for not capitulating to their shady shit.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable conversation" would be a FANTASTIC change of pace from someone out there trying to essentially destroy our lives for not capitulating to their shady shit.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable conversation" would be a FANTASTIC change of pace from someome out there trying to essentially destroy our lives for not capitulating to their shady shit.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable conversation" would be a FANTASTIC change of pace.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

All of these are reasonable expectations, yet I'd be seen as a fucking lunatic with all of the smearing, framing, and censorship. They would turn the whole world against us. A "reasonable comversation would be a FANTASTIC change of pace.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong? Big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? What about the disinformation about proven alternative preventative measures? What about the media's constant unchecked lying? What about the inflated death statistics? Why can't we sue anyone should things go wrong, big pharma has messed up people for life demonstrably and repeatedly through other applications why does all accountability stop at injections? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: Original

Yeah why don't we have a reasonable conversation about accountability and the fact that there is an entire financially incentivized process in suppressing any and all reports of potential side affects; or the fact that no one gets to speak up even within their own circles without being censored. What about the FDA covering pfizer's tracks for 75 years from now? What about all of the flip flopping you fuckers have been doing over the past two years? What about the outright lies? Surely the truth would not fear investigation - so let's start with "reasonable conversations".

No accountability, no jab. No support, no jab. No disclosure, no jab. No honesty, no jab.

2 years ago
1 score