I think they have to for budget reasons.

The evidence for a wrongful death civil case is overwhelming, I think the city and county will HAVE to go for charges to absolve themselves of some of that liability.

In a situation this stupid, the conversation shifts from the chief to the city's leadership and their insurance provider, and becomes very much a "you will do it or your coverage is terminated" conversation.

I think they have to for budget reasons.

The evidence for a wrongful death civil case is overwhelming, I think the city and county will HAVE to go for charges to absolve themselves of some of that liability.

In a situation this stupid, the conversation shifts from the chief to the city's leadership and their insurance provider, and becomes very much a "you will do it or your policy is terminated" conversation.

I think they have to for budget reasons.

The evidence for a wrongful death civil case is overwhelming, I think the city and county will HAVE to go for charges to absolve themselves of some of that liability.