You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.

The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.

So:

• he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites

• he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims

• he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races

• he cannot talk about in group preference

• he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual

• he cannot talk about immigration

But:

• he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)

• he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.

• he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happiness comes from individualism.

Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.

It's a slight of hand magic trick in 100 000 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.

The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.

You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.

Of course, individualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is inseparable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.

So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information in a VERY VERY VERY NARROW WAY. Which is exacly what we want, we want precision.

But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.

You can use this is the technique to evaluate everyone, even here on win forums. It's a great tool.

You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.

The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.

So:

• he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites

• he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims

• he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races

• he cannot talk about in group preference

• he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual

• he cannot talk about immigration

But:

• he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)

• he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.

• he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happyness comes from individualism.

Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.

It's a slight of hand magic trick in 100 000 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.

The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.

You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.

Of course, indivdiualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is in separable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.

So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information in a VERY VERY VERY NARROW WAY. Which is exacly what we want, we want precision.

But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.

You can use this is the technique to evaluate everyone, even here on win forums. It's a great tool.

You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.

The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.

So:

• he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites

• he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims

• he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races

• he cannot talk about in group preference

• he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual

• he cannot talk about immigration

But:

• he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)

• he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.

• he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happyness comes from individualism.

Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.

It's a slight of hand magic trick in 2500 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.

The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.

You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.

Of course, indivdiualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is in separable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.

So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information in a VERY VERY VERY NARROW WAY. Which is exacly what we want, we want precision.

But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.

You can use this is the technique to evaluate everyone, even here on win forums. It's a great tool.

You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.

The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.

So:

• he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites

• he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims

• he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races

• he cannot talk about in group preference

• he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual

• he cannot talk about immigration

But:

• he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)

• he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.

• he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happyness comes from individualism.

Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.

It's a slight of hand magic trick in 2500 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.

The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.

You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.

Of course, indivdiualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is in separable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.

So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information in a VERY VERY VERY NARROW WAY. Which is exacly what we want, we want precision.

But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.

He has an agenda, like all of us, this is the technique that you can use on anyone. Even here on win forums.

You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.

The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.

So:

• he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites

• he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims

• he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races

• he cannot talk about in group preference

• he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual

• he cannot talk about immigration

But:

• he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)

• he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.

• he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happyness comes from individualism.

Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.

It's a slight of hand magic trick in 2500 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.

The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.

You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.

Of course, indivdiualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is in separable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.

So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information. But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.

He has an agenda, like all of us, this is the technique that you can use on anyone. Even here on win forums.