A fascinating question, and I JUST posted in another thread that I wanted an arbitrary debate on any topic whatsoever with a proper discourse!

Assumption from your post: Let it be assumed that some people like loli who are not pedopheliac in nature. This is basically your entire premise.

Arising query: What traits attract such a person to such a thing? If they exist, they must have a reason. We do not assume perfectly rational actors, but we do assume sentient and sapient ones at the least: They seek pleasure, and/or flee from pain.

Obvious logical answer: They are attracted to the same traits they would be attracted to in an adult portrayal. If they are not pedopheliac in nature, then the traits they are attracted to would not be, logically speaking, those corely associated with pedopheliac aims.

Assumption from obvious answer: We can know what a pedopheliac "aims" at. This is a big assumption, but we have a lot of psychology data on these, so to define my terms as I will be using them...

Definitions: I would assign two types of pedopheliacs:

Pedo1 has an attraction to the mental traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo1, The Terminator from the movies of the same name is a legitimate target of attraction, as it has no knowledge of sin or sinner, sexuality, sociality, or moral behavior. The Terminator is "innocent" mentally, and that attracts them. But an actually-9000-year-old-vampire-who-was-turned-at-8-years-old would hold no attraction if their mental behavior was reflective of their age. I do not believe Pedo1 is a common thing, but it is included for completeness.

Pedo2 has an attraction to the physical traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo2, The Terminator, as portrayed by a clearly post-pubescent male, has no attractiveness, but the aforementioned vampire would, due to elements such as small stature, non-developed secondary sexual characteristics, and/or non-developed primary sexual characteristics.

The two make a quadrant matrix, they can exist in OR/NOR/AND/NAND/XOR states with each-other.

Clarification: So someone attracted to loli who is not pedopheliac in nature would need to avoid those traits, that is, a NOR situation, while still somehow being drawn to that medium.

Deduction: There exists traits highly common in "youthful portrayal", that are not exclusive to it, leading to an attraction to the medium.

Rationale: People will seek out their desire, and a place where that desire is common, they will congregate, even if their desire is tangential to the place's purpose. One who wants a quiet place to think may seek out a library, even if they have no intent on reading while there, in example, even if a music studio's soundproofed room may conceptually exist within accessible range to them and better suit their exact needs, because "close enough" is close enough for non-perfectly-logical actors.

Therefore we must find traits more common in loli/shota, that are not as common in adult oriented activity, but not exclusive to it. To do this, traits tangential to Pedo1 and Pedo2's assumed desires should be examined.

Pedo1 seeks those with no knowledge of sexuality or morality. "Innocence". Virginity porn and innocent-porn is common in many places in the world, that idiotic meme of "but that's where I poop from" exists because the scene it quotes exists. They could be seeking that aspect, and it is probably more plentiful in the loli/shota medium. But then again, if they're seeking innocence, they're probably a Pedo1... So to go one-level-removed.. Let's say "stupidity", instead, then: They seek an idiot, someone undereducated who they can dominate mentally, or teach, some level of superiority/inferiority situation.

Pedo2 seeks the underdeveloped. Someone seeking sporty types or more muscular frames perhaps would find overlap? I am reminded of Australia's meme-worthy legal ruling that women with A-sized cups are considered legally children, because their small chest size reminded that particular judge of children. So perhaps one who desires not children, but still flatter chests, would admire such works.

Pedo2 also seeks out small stature (assumption, but "Oppai Loli" exists as a seemingly self-contradicting category, so this is more likely a logical error spot). Small stature is often associated with large stature, size discrepancy. Giant black dicks and tiny white chicks, to reference a very popular pornography genre. Size disparity is also associated with domination and submission. While these are not rare fetishes (you can find hundreds of elf-on-orc size discrepancy doujins, and uncounted BDSM ones) perhaps they are more common, or better written, or better drawn in some way, of higher quality, in that sphere? Or it could simply be sheer quantity: You go where the supply exists for your demand.

Within the constraints you put forward, that's the best I got off the top of my head. Please check for logical inconsistencies, and reply back with your rebuttal.

EDIT: I just realized I forgot a VERY important point, a giant logic hole: "NOR" isn't necessary in the core assumption's characteristics. "Null" is also applicable. That is, there possibly exists an entity-set who would not care in either direction about Pedo1 or Pedo2's traits, that is agnostic to those traits entirely. But to get into that would take longer than I feel like typing, so feel free to remind me in the rebuttal, I'll get to it later. There could also be narrative and/or associative elements at play that I neglected to bring up, so tossing that as well as a touchstone. But these are just additional Deductions, they don't change the Obvious Logical Conclusion that this subject entity enjoys traits that exist common to and in both loli/shota and non-loli/shota settings.

A fascinating question, and I JUST posted in another thread that I wanted an arbitrary debate on any topic whatsoever with a proper discourse!

Assumption from your post: Let it be assumed that some people like loli who are not pedopheliac in nature. This is basically your entire premise.

Arising query: What traits attract such a person to such a thing? If they exist, they must have a reason. We do not assume perfectly rational actors, but we do assume sentient and sapient ones at the least: They seek pleasure, and/or flee from pain.

Obvious logical answer: They are attracted to the same traits they would be attracted to in an adult portrayal. If they are not pedopheliac in nature, then the traits they are attracted to would not be, logically speaking, those corely associated with pedopheliac aims.

Assumption from obvious answer: We can know what a pedopheliac "aims" at. This is a big assumption, but we have a lot of psychology data on these, so to define my terms as I will be using them...

Definitions: I would assign two types of pedopheliacs:

Pedo1 has an attraction to the mental traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo1, The Terminator from the movies of the same name is a legitimate target of attraction, as it has no knowledge of sin or sinner, sexuality, sociality, or moral behavior. The Terminator is "innocent" mentally, and that attracts them. But an actually-9000-year-old-vampire-who-was-turned-at-8-years-old would hold no attraction if their mental behavior was reflective of their age. I do not believe Pedo1 is a common thing, but it is included for completeness.

Pedo2 has an attraction to the physical traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo2, The Terminator, as portrayed by a clearly post-pubescent male, has no attractiveness, but the aforementioned vampire would, due to elements such as small stature, non-developed secondary sexual characteristics, and/or non-developed primary sexual characteristics.

The two make a quadrant matrix, they can exist in OR/NOR/AND/NAND/XOR states with each-other.

Clarification: So someone attracted to loli who is not pedopheliac in nature would need to avoid those traits, that is, a NOR situation, while still somehow being drawn to that medium.

Deduction: There exists traits highly common in "youthful portrayal", that are not exclusive to it, leading to an attraction to the medium.

Rationale: People will seek out their desire, and a place where that desire is common, they will congregate, even if their desire is tangential to the place's purpose. One who wants a quiet place to think may seek out a library, even if they have no intent on reading while there, in example, even if a music studio's soundproofed room may conceptually exist within accessible range to them and better suit their exact needs, because "close enough" is close enough for non-perfectly-logical actors.

Therefore we must find traits more common in loli/shota, that are not as common in adult oriented activity, but not exclusive to it. To do this, traits tangential to Pedo1 and Pedo2's assumed desires should be examined.

Pedo1 seeks those with no knowledge of sexuality or morality. "Innocence". Virginity porn and innocent-porn is common in many places in the world, that idiotic meme of "but that's where I poop from" exists because the scene it quotes exists. They could be seeking that aspect, and it is probably more plentiful in the loli/shota medium. But then again, if they're seeking innocence, they're probably a Pedo1... So to go one-level-removed.. Let's say "stupidity", instead, then: They seek an idiot, someone undereducated who they can dominate mentally, or teach, some level of superiority/inferiority situation.

Pedo2 seeks the underdeveloped. Someone seeking sporty types or more muscular frames perhaps would find overlap? I am reminded of Australia's meme-worthy legal ruling that women with A-sized cups are considered legally children, because their small chest size reminded that particular judge of children. So perhaps one who desires not children, but still flatter chests, would admire such works.

Pedo2 also seeks out small stature (assumption, but "Oppai Loli" exists as a seemingly self-contradicting category, so this is more likely a logical error spot). Small stature is often associated with large stature, size discrepancy. Giant black dicks and tiny white chicks, to reference a very popular pornography genre. Size disparity is also associated with domination and submission. While these are not rare fetishes (you can find hundreds of elf-on-orc size discrepancy doujins, and uncounted BDSM ones) perhaps they are more common, or better written, or better drawn in some way, of higher quality, in that sphere? Or it could simply be sheer quantity: You go where the supply exists for your demand.

Within the constraints you put forward, that's the best I got off the top of my head. Please check for logical inconsistencies, and reply back with your rebuttal.

EDIT: I just realized I forgot a VERY important point, a giant logic hole: "NOR" isn't necessary in the core assumption's characteristics. "Null" is also applicable. That is, there possibly exists an entity-set who would not care in either direction about Pedo1 or Pedo2's traits, that is agnostic to those traits entirely. But to get into that would take longer than I feel like typing, so feel free to remind me in the rebuttal, I'll get to it later. There could also be narrative and/or associative elements at play that I neglected to bring up, so tossing that as well as a touchstone. But these are just additional Deductions, they don't change the Obvious Logical Conclusion that this subject entity enjoys traits that exist in both loli/shota and non-loli/shota settings.

A fascinating question, and I JUST posted in another thread that I wanted an arbitrary debate on any topic whatsoever with a proper discourse!

Assumption from your post: Let it be assumed that some people like loli who are not pedopheliac in nature. This is basically your entire premise.

Arising query: What traits attract such a person to such a thing? If they exist, they must have a reason. We do not assume perfectly rational actors, but we do assume sentient and sapient ones at the least: They seek pleasure, and/or flee from pain.

Obvious logical answer: They are attracted to the same traits they would be attracted to in an adult portrayal. If they are not pedopheliac in nature, then the traits they are attracted to would not be, logically speaking, those corely associated with pedopheliac aims.

Assumption from obvious answer: We can know what a pedopheliac "aims" at. This is a big assumption, but we have a lot of psychology data on these, so to define my terms as I will be using them...

Definitions: I would assign two types of pedopheliacs:

Pedo1 has an attraction to the mental traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo1, The Terminator from the movies of the same name is a legitimate target of attraction, as it has no knowledge of sin or sinner, sexuality, sociality, or moral behavior. The Terminator is "innocent" mentally, and that attracts them. But an actually-9000-year-old-vampire-who-was-turned-at-8-years-old would hold no attraction if their mental behavior was reflective of their age. I do not believe Pedo1 is a common thing, but it is included for completeness.

Pedo2 has an attraction to the physical traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo2, The Terminator, as portrayed by a clearly post-pubescent male, has no attractiveness, but the aforementioned vampire would, due to elements such as small stature, non-developed secondary sexual characteristics, and/or non-developed primary sexual characteristics.

The two make a quadrant matrix, they can exist in OR/NOR/AND/NAND/XOR states with each-other.

Clarification: So someone attracted to loli who is not pedopheliac in nature would need to avoid those traits, that is, a NOR situation, while still somehow being drawn to that medium.

Deduction: There exists traits highly common in "youthful portrayal", that are not exclusive to it, leading to an attraction to the medium.

Rationale: People will seek out their desire, and a place where that desire is common, they will congregate, even if their desire is tangential to the place's purpose. One who wants a quiet place to think may seek out a library, even if they have no intent on reading while there, in example, even if a music studio's soundproofed room may conceptually exist within accessible range to them and better suit their exact needs, because "close enough" is close enough for non-perfectly-logical actors.

Therefore we must find traits more common in loli/shota, that are not as common in adult oriented activity, but not exclusive to it. To do this, traits tangential to Pedo1 and Pedo2's assumed desires should be examined.

Pedo1 seeks those with no knowledge of sexuality or morality. "Innocence". Virginity porn and innocent-porn is common in many places in the world, that idiotic meme of "but that's where I poop from" exists because the scene it quotes exists. They could be seeking that aspect, and it is probably more plentiful in the loli/shota medium. But then again, if they're seeking innocence, they're probably a Pedo1... So to go one-level-removed.. Let's say "stupidity", instead, then: They seek an idiot, someone undereducated who they can dominate mentally, or teach, some level of superiority/inferiority situation.

Pedo2 seeks the underdeveloped. Someone seeking sporty types or more muscular frames perhaps would find overlap? I am reminded of Australia's meme-worthy legal ruling that women with A-sized cups are considered legally children, because their small chest size reminded that particular judge of children. So perhaps one who desires not children, but still flatter chests, would admire such works.

Pedo2 also seeks out small stature (assumption, but "Oppai Loli" exists as a seemingly self-contradicting category, so this is more likely a logical error spot). Small stature is often associated with large stature, size discrepancy. Giant black dicks and tiny white chicks, to reference a very popular pornography genre. Size disparity is also associated with domination and submission. While these are not rare fetishes (you can find hundreds of elf-on-orc size discrepancy doujins, and uncounted BDSM ones) perhaps they are more common, or better written, or better drawn in some way, of higher quality, in that sphere? Or it could simply be sheer quantity: You go where the supply exists for your demand.

Within the constraints you put forward, that's the best I got off the top of my head. Please check for logical inconsistencies, and reply back with your rebuttal.

EDIT: I just realized I forgot a VERY important point, a giant logic hole: "NOR" isn't necessary in the core assumption's characteristics. "Null" is also applicable. That is, there possibly exists an entity-set who would not care in either direction about Pedo1 or Pedo2's traits, that is agnostic to those traits entirely. But to get into that would take longer than I feel like typing, so feel free to remind me in the rebuttal, I'll get to it later. There could also be narrative and/or associative elements at play that I neglected to bring up, so tossing that as well as a touchstone.

A fascinating question, and I JUST posted in another thread that I wanted an arbitrary debate on any topic whatsoever with a proper discourse!

Assumption from your post: Let it be assumed that some people like loli who are not pedopheliac in nature. This is basically your entire premise.

Arising query: What traits attract such a person to such a thing? If they exist, they must have a reason. We do not assume perfectly rational actors, but we do assume sentient and sapient ones at the least: They seek pleasure, and/or flee from pain.

Obvious logical answer: They are attracted to the same traits they would be attracted to in an adult portrayal. If they are not pedopheliac in nature, then the traits they are attracted to would not be, logically speaking, those corely associated with pedopheliac aims.

Assumption from obvious answer: We can know what a pedopheliac "aims" at. This is a big assumption, but we have a lot of psychology data on these, so to define my terms as I will be using them...

Definitions: I would assign two types of pedopheliacs:

Pedo1 has an attraction to the mental traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo1, The Terminator from the movies of the same name is a legitimate target of attraction, as it has no knowledge of sin or sinner, sexuality, sociality, or moral behavior. The Terminator is "innocent" mentally, and that attracts them. But an actually-9000-year-old-vampire-who-was-turned-at-8-years-old would hold no attraction if their mental behavior was reflective of their age. I do not believe Pedo1 is a common thing, but it is included for completeness.

Pedo2 has an attraction to the physical traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo2, The Terminator, as portrayed by a clearly post-pubescent male, has no attractiveness, but the aforementioned vampire would, due to elements such as small stature, non-developed secondary sexual characteristics, and/or non-developed primary sexual characteristics.

The two make a quadrant matrix, they can exist in OR/NOR/AND/NAND/XOR states with each-other.

Clarification: So someone attracted to loli who is not pedopheliac in nature would need to avoid those traits, that is, a NOR situation, while still somehow being drawn to that medium.

Deduction: There exists traits highly common in "youthful portrayal", that are not exclusive to it, leading to an attraction to the medium.

Rationale: People will seek out their desire, and a place where that desire is common, they will congregate, even if their desire is tangential to the place's purpose. One who wants a quiet place to think may seek out a library, even if they have no intent on reading while there, in example, even if a music studio's soundproofed room may conceptually exist within accessible range to them and better suit their exact needs, because "close enough" is close enough for non-perfectly-logical actors.

Therefore we must find traits more common in loli/shota, that are not as common in adult oriented activity, but not exclusive to it. To do this, traits tangential to Pedo1 and Pedo2's assumed desires should be examined.

Pedo1 seeks those with no knowledge of sexuality or morality. "Innocence". Virginity porn and innocent-porn is common in many places in the world, that idiotic meme of "but that's where I poop from" exists because the scene it quotes exists. They could be seeking that aspect, and it is probably more plentiful in the loli/shota medium. But then again, if they're seeking innocence, they're probably a Pedo1... So to go one-level-removed.. Let's say "stupidity", instead, then: They seek an idiot, someone undereducated who they can dominate mentally, or teach, some level of superiority/inferiority situation.

Pedo2 seeks the underdeveloped. Someone seeking sporty types or more muscular frames perhaps would find overlap? I am reminded of Australia's meme-worthy legal ruling that women with A-sized cups are considered legally children, because their small chest size reminded that particular judge of children. So perhaps one who desires not children, but still flatter chests, would admire such works.

Pedo2 also seeks out small stature (assumption, but "Oppai Loli" exists as a seemingly self-contradicting category, so this is more likely a logical error spot). Small stature is often associated with large stature, size discrepancy. Giant black dicks and tiny white chicks, to reference a very popular pornography genre. Size disparity is also associated with domination and submission. While these are not rare fetishes (you can find hundreds of elf-on-orc size discrepancy doujins, and uncounted BDSM ones) perhaps they are more common, or better written, or better drawn in some way, of higher quality, in that sphere? Or it could simply be sheer quantity: You go where the supply exists for your demand.

Within the constraints you put forward, that's the best I got off the top of my head. Please check for logical inconsistencies, and reply back with your rebuttal.

EDIT: I just realized I forgot a VERY important point, a giant logic hole: "NOR" isn't necessary in the core assumption's characteristics. "Null" is also applicable. That is, there possibly exists an entity-set who would not care in either direction about Pedo1 or Pedo2's traits, that is agnostic to those traits entirely. But to get into that would take longer than I feel like typing, so feel free to remind me in the rebuttal, I'll get to it later.

A fascinating question, and I JUST posted in another thread that I wanted an arbitrary debate on any topic whatsoever with a proper discourse!

Assumption from your post: Let it be assumed that some people like loli who are not pedopheliac in nature. This is basically your entire premise.

Arising query: What traits attract such a person to such a thing? If they exist, they must have a reason. We do not assume perfectly rational actors, but we do assume sentient and sapient ones at the least: They seek pleasure, and/or flee from pain.

Obvious logical answer: They are attracted to the same traits they would be attracted to in an adult portrayal. If they are not pedopheliac in nature, then the traits they are attracted to would not be, logically speaking, those corely associated with pedopheliac aims.

Assumption from obvious answer: We can know what a pedopheliac "aims" at. This is a big assumption, but we have a lot of psychology data on these, so to define my terms as I will be using them...

Definitions: I would assign two types of pedopheliacs:

Pedo1 has an attraction to the mental traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo1, The Terminator from the movies of the same name is a legitimate target of attraction, as it has no knowledge of sin or sinner, sexuality, sociality, or moral behavior. The Terminator is "innocent" mentally, and that attracts them. But an actually-9000-year-old-vampire-who-was-turned-at-8-years-old would hold no attraction if their mental behavior was reflective of their age. I do not believe Pedo1 is a common thing, but it is included for completeness.

Pedo2 has an attraction to the physical traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo2, The Terminator, as portrayed by a clearly post-pubescent male, has no attractiveness, but the aforementioned vampire would, due to elements such as small stature, non-developed secondary sexual characteristics, and/or non-developed primary sexual characteristics.

The two make a quadrant matrix, they can exist in OR/NOR/AND/NAND/XOR states with each-other.

Clarification: So someone attracted to loli who is not pedopheliac in nature would need to avoid those traits, that is, a NOR situation, while still somehow being drawn to that medium.

Deduction: There exists traits highly common in "youthful portrayal", that are not exclusive to it, leading to an attraction to the medium.

Rationale: People will seek out their desire, and a place where that desire is common, they will congregate, even if their desire is tangential to the place's purpose. One who wants a quiet place to think may seek out a library, even if they have no intent on reading while there, in example, even if a music studio's soundproofed room may conceptually exist within accessible range to them and better suit their exact needs, because "close enough" is close enough for non-perfectly-logical actors.

Therefore we must find traits more common in loli/shota, that are not as common in adult oriented activity, but not exclusive to it. To do this, traits tangential to Pedo1 and Pedo2's assumed desires should be examined.

Pedo1 seeks those with no knowledge of sexuality or morality. "Innocence". Virginity porn and innocent-porn is common in many places in the world, that idiotic meme of "but that's where I poop from" exists because the scene it quotes exists. They could be seeking that aspect, and it is probably more plentiful in the loli/shota medium. But then again, if they're seeking innocence, they're probably a Pedo1... So to go one-level-removed.. Let's say "stupidity", instead, then: They seek an idiot, someone undereducated who they can dominate mentally, or teach, some level of superiority/inferiority situation.

Pedo2 seeks the underdeveloped. Someone seeking sporty types or more muscular frames perhaps would find overlap? I am reminded of Australia's meme-worthy legal ruling that women with A-sized cups are considered legally children, because their small chest size reminded that particular judge of children. So perhaps one who desires not children, but still flatter chests, would admire such works.

Pedo2 also seeks out small stature (assumption, but "Oppai Loli" exists as a seemingly self-contradicting category, so this is more likely a logical error spot). Small stature is often associated with large stature, size discrepancy. Giant black dicks and tiny white chicks, to reference a very popular pornography genre. Size disparity is also associated with domination and submission. While these are not rare fetishes (you can find hundreds of elf-on-orc size discrepancy doujins, and uncounted BDSM ones) perhaps they are more common, or better written, or better drawn in some way, of higher quality, in that sphere? Or it could simply be sheer quantity: You go where the supply exists for your demand.

Within the constraints you put forward, that's the best I got off the top of my head. Please check for logical inconsistencies, and reply back with your rebuttal.

A fascinating question, and I JUST posted in another thread that I wanted an arbitrary debate on any topic whatsoever with a proper discourse!

Assumption from your post: Let it be assumed that some people like loli who are not pedopheliac in nature. This is basically your entire premise.

Arising query: What traits attract such a person to such a thing? If they exist, they must have a reason. We do not assume perfectly rational actors, but we do assume sentient and sapient ones at the least: They seek pleasure, and/or flee from pain.

Obvious logical answer: They are attracted to the same traits they would be attracted to in an adult portrayal. If they are not pedopheliac in nature, then the traits they are attracted to would not be, logically speaking, those corely associated with pedopheliac aims.

Assumption from obvious answer: We can know what a pedopheliac "aims" at. This is a big assumption, but we have a lot of psychology data on these, so to define my terms as I will be using them...

Definitions: I would assign two types of pedopheliacs:

Pedo1 has an attraction to the mental traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo1, The Terminator from the movies of the same name is a legitimate target of attraction, as it has no knowledge of sin or sinner, sexuality, sociality, or moral behavior. The Terminator is "innocent" mentally, and that attracts them. But an actually-9000-year-old-vampire-who-was-turned-at-8-years-old would hold no attraction if their mental behavior was reflective of their age. I do not believe Pedo1 is a common thing, but it is included for completeness.

Pedo2 has an attraction to the physical traits inherent in children, but not adults. To a Pedo2, The Terminator, as portrayed by a clearly post-pubescent male, has no attractiveness, but the aforementioned vampire would, due to elements such as small stature, non-developed secondary sexual characteristics, and/or non-developed primary sexual characteristics.

The two make a quadrant matrix, they can exist in OR/NOR/AND/NAND/XOR states with each-other.

Clarification: So someone attracted to loli who is not pedopheliac in nature would need to avoid those traits, that is, a NOR situation, while still somehow being drawn to that medium.

Deduction: There exists traits highly common in "youthful portrayal", that are not exclusive to it, leading to an attraction to the medium.

Rationale: People will seek out their desire, and a place where that desire is common, they will congregate, even if their desire is tangential to the place's purpose. One who wants a quiet place to think may seek out a library, even if they have no intent on reading while there, in example, even if a music studio's soundproofed room may conceptually exist within accessible range to them and better suit their exact needs, because "close enough" is close enough for non-perfectly-logical actors.

Therefore we must find traits more common in loli/shota, that are not as common in adult oriented activity, but not exclusive to it. To do this, traits tangential to Pedo1 and Pedo2's assumed desires should be examined.

Pedo1 seeks those with no knowledge of sexuality or morality. "Innocence". Virginity porn and innocent-porn is common in many places in the world, that idiotic meme of "but that's where I poop from" exists because the scene it quotes exists. They could be seeking that aspect, and it is probably more plentiful in the loli/shota medium. But then again, if they're seeking innocence, they're probably a Pedo1... So to go one-level-removed.. Let's say "stupidity", instead, then: They seek an idiot, someone undereducated who they can dominate mentally, or teach, some level of superiority/inferiority situation.

Pedo2 seeks the underdeveloped. Someone seeking sporty types or more muscular frames perhaps would find overlap? I am reminded of Australia's meme-worthy legal ruling that women with A-sized cups are considered legally children, because their small chest size reminded that particular judge of children. So perhaps one who desires not children, but still flatter chests, would admire such works.

Pedo2 also seeks out small stature (assumption). Small stature is often associated with large stature, size discrepancy. Giant black dicks and tiny white chicks, to reference a very popular pornography genre. Size disparity is also associated with domination and submission. While these are not rare fetishes (you can find hundreds of elf-on-orc size discrepancy doujins, and uncounted BDSM ones) perhaps they are more common, or better written, or better drawn in some way, of higher quality, in that sphere? Or it could simply be sheer quantity: You go where the supply exists for your demand.

Within the constraints you put forward, that's the best I got off the top of my head. Please check for logical inconsistencies, and reply back with your rebuttal.