not as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and everyone else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership (except for beggers), as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. But then communists like you can only ever think of things in terms of materialism of course)

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and everyone else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership (except for beggers), as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. But then communists like you can only ever think of things in terms of materialism of course)

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and everyone else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership except for beggers, as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. But then communists like you can only ever think of things in terms of materialism of course)

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and everyone else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and generally leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership except for beggers, as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. But then communists like you can only ever think of things in terms of materialism of course)

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and every else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and generally leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership except for beggers, as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. But then communists like you can only ever think of things in terms of materialism of course)

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and every else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and generally leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership except for beggers, as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. but then communists can only ever think of things in terms of materialism of course)

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and every else equally poor at the bottom.

(Oh and generally leader's "interests" , generally have to do with their loyalties and personal convictions, not how rich they are. Or else you have to remove literally everyone from leadership except for beggers, as they will all be richer than someone else and so are not going to be good leaders, by your theory. )

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and every else equally poor at the bottom

no as stupid as to think that having another communist revolution is not going to end up with the same results as every other communist revolution with an authoritarian at the top and every else equally poor the bottom