How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? If anything Parler would save democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want (At least IF its legit and not a honeypot which it could be) . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. (Also if they apparently don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?)

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? If anything Parler would save democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. (Also if they apparently don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?)

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? If anything Parler (if its legit and not a honeypot though certain things do seem strange) would save democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. (Also if they apparently don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?)

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? If anything Parler saves democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. (Also if they apparently don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?)

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? Parler SAVES democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. (Also if they apparently don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?)

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? Parler SAVES democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. (Also if they don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?)

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? Parler SAVES democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. Also if they don't like "echo chambers" then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? Parler SAVES democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas. Also if they don't like echo chambers then why didn't they speak out against twitter censoring and banning people?

How do these people define democracy? Is democracy defined as only voting for what THEY want? Parler SAVES democracy cause it allows people freedom of speech to decide what they actually want . Twitter is a threat to democracy cause they censor and ban people and don't let people have free exchange of ideas