If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? (Edit2: slight correction) Or how about an essay titled "The Future - If There Is One- Is Female" which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.

EDIT: And for a final point that caused me to flee from KIA1 in the first place. Feminists, BLM, and Antifa are all part of the same rotting left wing, and they all occupy Academia, Media (all media, not just video games as we would find out), Hollywood, and an entire US political party. They have declared ideological war on all that don't fall lockstep with their ever changing doctrine, a war that as of last month (Portland, OR shooting) has turned hot. The mod team of KIA1 refused/ignored/hid from this inevitable conclusion, and it cost them their sub.

If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? (Edit2: slight correction) Or how about a book titled "The Future - If There Is One- Is Female" which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.

EDIT: And for a final point that caused me to flee from KIA1 in the first place. Feminists, BLM, and Antifa are all part of the same rotting left wing, and they all occupy Academia, Media (all media, not just video games as we would find out), Hollywood, and an entire US political party. They have declared ideological war on all that don't fall lockstep with their ever changing doctrine, a war that as of last month (Portland, OR shooting) has turned hot. The mod team of KIA1 refused/ignored/hid from this inevitable conclusion, and it cost them their sub.

If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? A book which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.

EDIT: And for a final point that caused me to flee from KIA1 in the first place. Feminists, BLM, and Antifa are all part of the same rotting left wing, and they all occupy Academia, Media (all media, not just video games as we would find out), Hollywood, and an entire US political party. They have declared ideological war on all that don't fall lockstep with their ever changing doctrine, a war that as of last month (Portland, OR shooting) has turned hot. The mod team of KIA1 refused/ignored/hid from this inevitable conclusion, and it cost them their sub. I hope that you don't follow their fate as well.

If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? A book which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.

EDIT: And for a final point that caused me to flee from KIA1 in the first place. Feminists, BLM, and Antifa are all part of the same rotting left wing, and they all occupy Academia, Media (all media, not just video games as we would find out), Hollywood, and an entire US political party. They have declared ideological war on all that don't fall lockstep with their ever changing doctrine, a war that as of last month (Portland, OR shooting) has turned hot. The mod team of KIA1 refused/ignored/hid from this inevitable conclusion, and it cost them their sub.

If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? A book which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.

If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? A book which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.

If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.

Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.

The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.

You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? A book which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?

You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.

That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.

That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation, giving myself and other the impression that you delivering equal enforcement of the rules relies on you having your morning hot pocket

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.

See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds.

There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

Tell that to the feminists.