The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.

I don't see how this matters in regard to creating pornographic images of children? Whether the child is real or not doesn't change the purpose of the imagery. Which is to produce sexual arousal towards children.

"You thought about hurting a kid! That is the same as hurting a kid! Prison for you!"

Wrong. I already addressed this point in my other reply here. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.

I also never said they should be in jail for this act alone. Although if it were up to me, I probably would just put a bullet in their head as you suggested. I said they should be looked at more closely. Because rarely is this a behavior that exists in a vacuum, that doesn't escalate into further interest and/or action.

The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.

I don't see how this matters in regard to creating pornographic images of children? Whether the child is real or not doesn't change the purpose of the imagery. Which is to produce sexual arousal towards children.

"You thought about hurting a kid! That is the same as hurting a kid! Prison for you!"

Wrong. I already addressed this point in my other reply here. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.

I also never said they should be in jail for this act alone. Although if it were up to me I probably would just put a bullet in their head as you suggested. I said they should be looked at more closely. Because rarely is this a behavior that exists in a vacuum, that doesn't escalate into further interest and/or action.

The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.

I don't see how this matters in regard to creating pornographic images of children? Whether the child is real or not doesn't change the purpose of the imagery. Which is to produce sexual arousal towards children.

"You thought about hurting a kid! That is the same as hurting a kid! Prison for you!"

Wrong. Read my other reply here. I already addressed this point. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.

I also never said they should be in jail for this act alone. Although if it were up to me I probably would just put a bullet in their head as you suggested. I said they should be looked at more closely. Because rarely is this a behavior that exists in a vacuum, that doesn't escalate into further interest and/or action.

The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.

I don't see how this matters in regard to creating pornographic images of children? Whether the child is real or not doesn't change the purpose of the imagery. Which is to produce sexual arousal towards children.

"You thought about hurting a kid! That is the same as hurting a kid! Prison for you!"

Wrong. Read my other reply here. I already addressed this point. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.

I also never said they should be in jail for this act alone. Although if it were up to me I probably would just put a bullet in their head as you suggested. I said they should be looked at more closely. Because rarely is this a behavior that doesn't escalate into further action.

The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.

I don't see how this matters in regard to creating pornographic images of children? Whether the child is real or not doesn't change the purpose of the imagery. Which is to produce sexual arousal towards children.

Wrong. Read my other reply here. I already addressed this point. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.

Wrong. Read my other reply here. I already addressed this point. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.