Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Cap was fine with being held accountable. He wasn't going to abdicate his moral responsibility to a political committee.

Steve's position was that political committee or not, the power to act was in the hands of the Avengers, so the moral responsibility was theirs too.

Steve was burned by shitty orders and murky political interests in WWII and was not going to do that again. If that meant being hunted down by major government forces, then he was willing to wear that.

That is the exact opposite of refusing to be held accountable.

In contrast Tony Stark wanted to concede his moral responsibility to the government. He had made a bunch of decisions that had turned out really badly (including the creation of Ultron) and he felt guilty. He saw giving up responsibility for command decisions to some bullshit UN committee as a way to absolve himself from both the responsibility for his mistakes and the guilt that followed.

You dun goofed watching that one, guy. You got that one almost exactly backwards.

24 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Cap was fine with being held accountable. He wasn't going to abdicate his moral responsibility to a political committee.

Steve's position was that political committee or not, the power to act was in the hands of the Avengers, so the moral responsibility was theirs too.

Steve was burned by shitty orders and murky political interests in WWII and was not going to do that again. If that meant being hunted down by major government forces, then he was willing to wear that.

That is the exact opposite of refusing to be held accountable.

You dun goofed watching that one, guy.

24 days ago
1 score