Why would they say he claimed without proof.

Because this became the new media standard around the end of Trump's first term. For commie indoctrinators and indoctrinated, it's very dangerous to broadcast what your political opponents are saying without insisting simultaneously that it shouldn't be listened to. "X Claims Without Evidence That...", "X Claims (Without Proof)..." is what the MSM started doing even in news headlines whenever a person they disliked made a claim that attacked their power. Compare and contrast to reporting on, say, any murder case where a suspect with no good alibi claims to have been elsewhere when the murder happened - you would never hear "X claims, without evidence, to have been alone at home at the time." You only started hearing it for Trump, even when he was quite definitely and obviously providing evidence. And so their sheep have started repeating 'claims-without-evidence' mindlessly, practically as if it's a compound word now, which keeps their ideology safe from evil claims(without-evidence).

Why would they say he claimed without proof.

Because this became the new media standard around the end of Trump's first term. For commie indoctrinators and indoctrinated, it's very dangerous to broadcast what your political opponents are saying without insisting simultaneously that it shouldn't be listened to. "X Claims Without Evidence That...", "X Claims (Without Proof)..." is what the MSM started doing even in news headlines whenever a person they disliked made a claim that attacked their power. Compare and contrast to reporting on, say, any murder case where a suspect with no alibi claims to have been elsewhere when the murder happened - you would never hear "X claims, without evidence, to have been alone at home at the time." You only started hearing it for Trump, even when he was quite definitely and obviously providing evidence. And so their sheep have started repeating 'claims-without-evidence' mindlessly, practically as if it's a compound word now, which keeps their ideology safe from evil claims(without-evidence).

Why would they say he claimed without proof.

Because this became the new media standard around the end of Trump's first term. For commie indoctrinators and indoctrinated, it's very dangerous to broadcast what your political opponents are saying without insisting simultaneously that it shouldn't be listened to. "X Claims Without Evidence That...", "X Claims (Without Proof)..." is what the MSM started doing even in news headlines whenever a person they disliked made a claim that attacked their power. Compare and contrast to reporting on, say, any murder case where a suspect with no alibi claims to have been elsewhere when the murder happened - you would never hear "X claims, without evidence, to have been at home alone at the time." You only started hearing it for Trump, even when he was quite definitely and obviously providing evidence. And so their sheep have started repeating 'claims-without-evidence' mindlessly, practically as if it's a compound word now, which keeps their ideology safe from evil claims(without-evidence).

Why would they say he claimed without proof.

Because this became the new media standard around the end of Trump's first term. For commie indoctrinators and indoctrinated, it's very dangerous to broadcast what your political opponents are saying without insisting simultaneously that it shouldn't be listened to. "X Claims Without Evidence, That...", "X Claims (Without Proof)..." is what the MSM started doing even in news headlines whenever a person they disliked made a claim that attacked their power. Compare and contrast to reporting on, say, any murder case where a suspect with no alibi claims to have been elsewhere when the murder happened - you would never hear "X claims, without evidence, to have been at home alone at the time." You only started hearing it for Trump, even when he was quite definitely and obviously providing evidence. And so their sheep have started repeating 'claims-without-evidence' mindlessly, practically as if it's a compound word now, which keeps their ideology safe from evil claims(without-evidence).