Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Is your point to make it look like you were trying to paint the CCP as oppressed while tossing in one European for plausible deniability so you can collect your $0.50?

No? Then it failed. Any way you slice it, including the same person 4 times looks like desperation.

Edit: I see now that it was filtered down to English-speaking markets to get the desired results.
Edit 2: Also, the retard who made this confused Million and Billion. Facebook has 2.7B users. TikTok has 617M. WeChat has 689M. So they drop WeChat for not being "English" but then count all TikTok users. Hack job.

13 hours ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Is your point to make it look like you were trying to paint the CCP as oppressed while tossing in one European for plausible deniability so you can collect your $0.50?

No? Then it failed. Any way you slice it, including the same person 4 times looks like desperation.

Edit: I see now that it was filtered down to English-speaking markets to get the desired results.
Edit 2: Also, the retard who made this confused Million and Billion. Facebook has 2.7B users. TikTok has 617M. WeChat has 689. So they drop WeChat for not being "English" but then count all TikTok users. Hack job.

13 hours ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Is your point to make it look like you were trying to paint the CCP as oppressed while tossing in one European for plausible deniability so you can collect your $0.50?

No? Then it failed. Any way you slice it, including the same person 4 times looks like desperation.

Edit: I see now that it was filtered down to English-speaking markets to get the desired results. Edit 2: Also, the retard who made this confused Million and Billion. Facebook has 2.7B users. TikTok has 617M. WeChat has 689. So they drop WeChat for not being "English" but then count all TikTok users. Hack job.

13 hours ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Is your point to make it look like you were trying to paint the CCP as oppressed while tossing in one European for plausible deniability so you can collect your $0.50?

No? Then it failed. Any way you slice it, including the same person 4 times looks like desperation.

Edit: I see now that it was filtered down to English-speaking markets to get the desired results.

13 hours ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Is your point to make it look like you were trying to paint the CCP as oppressed while tossing in one European for plausible deniability so you can collect your $0.50?

No? Then it failed. Any way you slice it, including the same person 4 times looks like desperation.

13 hours ago
1 score