What's happening with the New-York state lawsuit demanding Trump pays 500+++ millions in fine for a mutually-agreed loan ( paied back in full plus interests ) from a bank that said they were categorically not defrauded?

The hearings on appeal was a bunch of skeptical judges asking the prosecution's lawyer ''but there was never this kind of lawsuit in a case where both parties were knowledgeable, did their own evaluation and agreed, right?''

And the lawyer kept bringing up examples that were not comparable to what they did to Trump ( and which was never done again to other buisnessmen who take similar loans with banks, backed with property values both agree on and are not at all value listed for property taxes ).

What's happening with the New-York state lawsuit demanding Trump pays 500+++ millions in fine for a mutually-agreed loan ( paied back in full plus interests ) from a bank that said they were categorically not defrauded?

The hearings on appeal was a bunch of skeptical judges asking the prosecution's lawyer ''but there was never this kind of lawsuit in a case where both parties were knowledgeable, did their own evaluation and agreed, right?''

And the lawyer kept bringing up examples that were not comparable to what they did to Trump.

What's happening with the New-York state lawsuit demanding Trump pays 500+++ millions in fine for a mutually-agreed loan ( paied back in full plus interests ) from a bank that said they were categorically not defrauded?

The hearings on appeal was a bunch of skeptical judges asking the prosecution's lawyer ''but there was never this kind of lawsuit in a case where both parties were knowledgeable, did their own evaluation and agreed, right?''