What, no attempt to deny the validity of the clips?

No attempt to deny the validity of the clips that you haven't presented? What? It's interesting that you'll rage and rave against Bad Russher, while studiously avoiding mentioning where you got any of your agitprop.

Because we both know where you get it.

you're unironically pro-nuclear war?

What a strange way to talk about 'actions have consequences'. Yes, if you participate in attacks on Russia, then Russia will participate in attacks on you.

You're used to being able to blow up everything in other countries and to kill a million people in Iraq, while simultaneously pretending that you and your fellow neocons are 'the good guys', but I'm not entirely sure you get to blow up in the world's greatest nuclear power while facing zero consquences. Keep trying though.

For the crime of having allies?

Ally? You mean puppet coup government? Imagine Russia coup'ing Mexico's government, provoking a war, then participating in attacks on the Evil Empire. I don't think you then would be quite as restrained as Russia is.

The counter examples clearly show that they do not have to give in to protests, especially not small ones, because they can (and will) just kill everyone

When there are thousands of protests in China each year, and no one is killed, the fact that you have to go back to 1989 proves my case. It's funny how your fake concern for 'human rights' only comes around when it suits the MIC's interests. You suddenly got concerned about the chemical weapons you gave Saddam when you were allied with him when you were trying to justify a war of aggression. Imagine that!

or ban keywords (and even emojis)

Learn to code?

social media (which is all state controlled).

How many FBI and CIA folks are there at US social media companies?

P.S. I'm glad you're finding this as entertaining as I do. There are so few people here in favor of that corrupt, puppet shithole non-country. I miss fighting with people over this issue.

What, no attempt to deny the validity of the clips?

No attempt to deny the validity of the clips that you haven't presented? What? It's interesting that you'll rage and rave against Bad Russher, while studiously avoiding mentioning where you got any of your agitprop.

Because we both know where you get it.

you're unironically pro-nuclear war? For the crime of having allies?

What a strange way to talk about 'actions have consequences'. Yes, if you participate in attacks on Russia, then Russia will participate in attacks on you.

You're used to being able to blow up everything in other countries and to kill a million people in Iraq, while simultaneously pretending that you and your fellow neocons are 'the good guys', but I'm not entirely sure you get to blow up in the world's greatest nuclear power while facing zero consquences. Keep trying though.

The counter examples clearly show that they do not have to give in to protests, especially not small ones, because they can (and will) just kill everyone

When there are thousands of protests in China each year, and no one is killed, the fact that you have to go back to 1989 proves my case. It's funny how your fake concern for 'human rights' only comes around when it suits the MIC's interests. You suddenly got concerned about the chemical weapons you gave Saddam when you were allied with him when you were trying to justify a war of aggression. Imagine that!

or ban keywords (and even emojis)

Learn to code?

social media (which is all state controlled).

How many FBI and CIA folks are there at US social media companies?