What I meant is more in the sense of balance of probabilities. You've been presented with evidence she's a jew but the evidence isn't entirely rock solid because there's no archive but her comment does seem to align with another comment you know was true. It's also a weirdly illogical comment that doesn't seem likely to have been faked because a faker would have probably been more direct so the evidence is good but not sound.

Therefore, you have to conclude she either is or isn't, though you could say "unknown". Still, based on how she has behaved given the evidence, I think it's enough to conclude she is jewish but that's my opinion ofc and there's really nothing 100%. There never truly is 100% solid evidence since she could be making up her own words too or was lied to by her parents about her ancestry also.

If it talks, walks, acts like a duck, it's a duck.

What I meant is more in the sense of balance of probabilities. You've been presented with evidence she's a jew but the evidence isn't entirely rock solid because there's no archive but her comment does seem to align with another comment you know was true. It's also a weirdly illogical comment that doesn't seem likely to have been faked because a faker would have probably been more direct so the evidence is good but not sound.

Therefore, you have to conclude she either is or isn't, though you could say "unknown". Still, based on how she has behaved given the evidence, I think it's enough to conclude she is jewish but that's my opinion ofc and there's really nothing 100%. There never truly is 100% solid evidence since she could be making up her own words too or was lied to by her parents about her ancestry also.