Trusted flagers, if I read the law correctly, is a glorified moderator approved by one of the communication agencies(FCC for americans) of a member state. And forces companies to prioritise reports from them.

A. Nothing says the companies can't reject them for being frivolous

B. Companies can (at least theoretically) report to the approver that the "trusted flagger" is a giant faggot and only spams frivolous requests to at least get them suspended until they investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing

Of course, by the nature of how these guys are approved is completely nonsensical.

Trusted flagers, if I read the law correctly, is a glorified moderator approved by one of the communication agencies(FCC for americans) of a member state. And forces companies to prioritise reports from them.

A. Nothing says the companies can't reject them for being frivolous

B. Companies can (at least theoretically) report to the approver that the "trusted flagger" is a giant faggot and only spams frivolous requests to at least get them suspended

Of course, by the nature of how these guys are approved is completely nonsensical.

Trusted flagers, if I read the law correctly, is a glorified moderator approved by one of the communication agencies(FCC for americans) of a member state. And forces companies to prioritise reports from them.

A. Nothing says the companies can't reject them for being frivolous

B. Companies can (at least theoretically) report to the approver that the "trusted flagger" is a giant faggot and only spams frivolous requests to at least get them suspended