And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
Yes, it's cronyism, because all corruption requires cronyism. As a tyrant, you require loyalty among your subordinates and surrogates. That requires glad-handing, bribes, influence-peddling, and providing your subordinates and surrogates with things they are otherwise not merited to achieve on their own. This isn't new, this exists, this has been the case in all societies that have ever experienced corruption.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, specific request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
But then you accept that he is the powerful and corrupt:
Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
Ah yes, because only jews are biologically capable of corruption? Oh wait, that doesn't make any sense, and your assertion is beyond asinine. It can't possibly be that corrupt people build networks of corruption to protect their power, it can only be racialism that preforms any corrupt act.
You ask me to prove that corruption exists at all within my claim, and then press the counter-claim that an entire race, through all time and space, is capable only of corruption, and your claim is so patently self-evident it requires no proof whatsoever.
Take your bad faith sophistry somewhere else.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
Yes, it's cronyism, because all corruption requires cronyism. As a tyrant, you require loyalty among your subordinates and surrogates. That requires glad-handing, bribes, influence-peddling, and providing your subordinates and surrogates with things they are otherwise not merited to achieve on their own. This isn't new, this exists, this has been the case in all societies that have ever experienced corruption.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
But then you accept that he is the powerful and corrupt:
Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
Ah yes, because only jews are biologically capable of corruption? Oh wait, that doesn't make any sense, and your assertion is beyond asinine. It can't possibly be that corrupt people build networks of corruption to protect their power, it can only be racialism that preforms any corrupt act.
You ask me to prove that corruption exists at all within my claim, and then counter-claim with the assertion that an entire race, through all time and space, is capable only of corruption, and your claim is so patently self-evident it requires no proof whatsoever.
Take your bad faith sophistry somewhere else.