In a way, it's a rather "racist" perception on the part of leftists. Where they tout tribal warfare as being nowhere near as big of a deal, simply because the scale of war and weaponry employed aren't comparable to that of Europeans.

Which is also doubly stupid if they're not comparing against examples of European warfare with similar population sizes/density and relative technological development.

In a way, it's a rather "racist" perception on the part of leftists. Where they tout tribal warfare as being nowhere near as big of a deal, simply because the scale of war and weaponry employed aren't comparable to that of Europeans.

Which is also doubly stupid if they're not comparing against examples European warfare with similar population sizes/density and relative technological development.

In a way, it's a rather "racist" perception on the part of leftists. Where they tout tribal warfare as being nowhere near as big of a deal, simply because the scale of war and weaponry employed aren't comparable to that of Europeans.

In a way, it's a rather "racist" perception on the part of leftists. Where they tout tribal warfare as being nowhere near as big of a deal, simply because the scale of war and weaponry employed aren't comparable to that of Europeans.

In a way, it is a "racist" perception on the part of leftists. Where they tout tribal warfare as being nowhere near as big of a deal somehow, simply because the scale of war and weaponry employed isn't comparable to that of Europeans.

In a way, it is a "racist" perception on the part of leftists. Where they tout tribal warfare as being nowhere near as big of a deal somehow, simply because the scale of war and weaponry employed isn't comparable to that of Europeans.

Yet overall, the results of war are likely fairly equivalent.