Trudeau still sucks, but you do bring up an interesting question.

In a representative democracy, does the ideal representative do what's right for the people or what the people want them to? On paper, someone elected by a bunch of retards in San Francisco is doing their job perfectly if they push for the policies those retards want. BUT, the policies they request and the outcomes that they actually want are usually in complete opposition. "REEEEE, want open borders but also please do something about crime! No police though, police bad." At what point does ignoring your constituents to save them from themselves become the job? And how is that not a double-sided argument when some RINO cucks to leftist policies against the will of their constituents?

Edit: The obvious answer is describing why you're voting on legislation the way you are, but 3 people are going to read your press releases. Anyone else is getting it repackaged by the MSM.

Trudeau still sucks, but you do bring up an interesting question.

In a representative democracy, does the ideal representative do what's right for the people or what the people want them to? On paper, someone elected by a bunch of retards in San Francisco is doing their job perfectly if they push for the policies those retards want. BUT, the policies they request and the outcomes that they actually want are usually in complete opposition. "REEEEE, want open borders but also please do something about crime! No police though, police bad." At what point does ignoring your constituents to save them from themselves become the job? And how is that not a double-sided argument when some RINO cucks to leftist policies against the will of their constituents?