There's conspiracy theorists and then there's those rejecting reality.

Conspiracy theorists work on the fact that there is a lack of evidence or clarity in an event and propose a hypothesis in order to fill the gaps.

Rejection of reality is when you have clarity and evidence but reject it because it doesn't fit an internal narrative you have in your head.

The latter is way more dangerous as when you start down that road you can quickly justify dangerous actions to maintain that narrative.

Besides they ALREADY target us that way, what do you think red flag laws are?

There's conspiracy theorists and then there's those rejecting reality.

Conspiracy theorists work on the fact that there is a lack of evidence or clarity in an event and propose a hypothesis in order to fill the gaps.

Rejection of reality is when you have clarity and evidence but reject it because it doesn't fit an internal narrative you have in your head.

The later is way more dangerous as when you start down that road you can quickly justify dangerous actions to maintain that narrative.

Besides they ALREADY target us that way, what do you think red flag laws are?

There's conspiracy theorists and then there's those rejecting reality.

Conspiracy theorists work on the fact that there is a lack of evidence or clarity in an event and propose a hypothesis in order to fill the gaps.

Rejection of reality is when you have clarity and evidence but reject it because it doesn't fit an internal narrative you have in your head.

The later us way more dangerous as when you start down that road you can quickly justify dangerous actions to maintain that narrative.

Besides they ALREADY target us that way, what do you think red flag laws are?