It's not an order, I'm just explaining to you what the rule is because I like to not hide what the rule means.

And I refuse, because to do so would be simply playing into the game the muslim apologists have set up, as I have explained earlier.

See, that's actually a criticism of the religion, that's why that's okay.

See, not an 'identity attack'.

No, I just want you to be clear about the distinction. The reason a Muslim behaves in a morally inferior way is from the institution of the religion, and once outside of that religion, their behavior may return to normal.

Incorrect. The reason muslims behave like that is because not just their religion - but also their society and cultural norms are built as that of an invading army. They even dehumanize and enslave their own children because they're replaceable with fresh slaves. They are convinced of the superiority of their doctrine, and in the belief that they are to rule over the world. Their greed, laziness and perverse urges binds them to constantly seek new slaves.

The few who dare break out of the islamic plantation are marked as 'apostates' and islamic law specifically states the death penalty for these people.

The gimmiegrants are not defectors from islam - but invaders that refuse to integrate with their host countries, then rot the unfortunate nation's society with a combination of crime, drug and sex trafficking, that rapidly shifts up to regulatory capture in order to enslave - then slowly destroy their host cultures.

I don't use chatGPT (I don't know how). I just sound like this.

If that's the case, stop adding random words like you did with "overrepresentation" and acting like I said anything about that.

So, what you're saying is that you can't claim I'm JIDF now? Hmmmm Intriguing offer, but I'll have to pass.

I don't really care what you are, but if you cover up the atrocities committed by invading muslims - that makes you an enemy.

You can criticize Islam all you want.

And I will criticize muslims too.

It's not an order, I'm just explaining to you what the rule is because I like to not hide what the rule means.

And I refuse, because to do so would be simply playing into the game the muslim apologists have set up, as I have explained earlier.

See, that's actually a criticism of the religion, that's why that's okay.

See, not an 'identity attack'.

No, I just want you to be clear about the distinction. The reason a Muslim behaves in a morally inferior way is from the institution of the religion, and once outside of that religion, their behavior may return to normal.

Incorrect. The reason muslims behave like that is because not just their religion - but also their society and cultural norms are built as that of an invading army. They even dehumanize and enslave their own children because they're replaceable with fresh slaves. They are convinced of the superiority of their doctrine, and in the belief that they are to rule over the world. Their greed, laziness and perverse urges binds them to constantly seek new slaves.

The few who dare break out of the islamic plantation are marked as 'apostates' and islamic law specifically states the death penalty for these people.

The gimmiegrants are not defectors from islam - but invaders that refuse to integrate with their host countries, then rot the unfortunate nation's society with a combination of crime, drug and sex trafficking, that rapidly shifts up to regulatory capture in order to enslave - then slowly destroy their host cultures.

I don't use chatGPT (I don't know how). I just sound like this.

If that's the case, stop adding random words and acting like I said anything about "overrepresentation".

So, what you're saying is that you can't claim I'm JIDF now? Hmmmm Intriguing offer, but I'll have to pass.

I don't really care what you are, but if you cover up the atrocities committed by invading muslims - that makes you an enemy.

You can criticize Islam all you want.

And I will criticize muslims too.

It's not an order, I'm just explaining to you what the rule is because I like to not hide what the rule means.

And I refuse, because to do so would be simply playing into the game the muslim apologists have set up, as I have explained earlier.

See, that's actually a criticism of the religion, that's why that's okay.

See, not an 'identity attack'.

No, I just want you to be clear about the distinction. The reason a Muslim behaves in a morally inferior way is from the institution of the religion, and once outside of that religion, their behavior may return to normal.

Incorrect. The reason muslims behave like that is because not just their religion - but also their society and cultural norms are built as that of an invading army. They even dehumanize and enslave their own children. They are convinced of the superiority of their doctrine, and in the belief that they are to rule over the world. Their greed, laziness and perverse urges binds them to constantly seek new slaves.

The few who dare break out of the islamic plantation are marked as 'apostates' and islamic law specifically states the death penalty for these people.

The gimmiegrants are not defectors from islam - but invaders that refuse to integrate with their host countries, then rot the unfortunate nation's society with a combination of crime, drug and sex trafficking, that rapidly shifts up to regulatory capture in order to enslave - then slowly destroy their host cultures.

So, what you're saying is that you can't claim I'm JIDF now? Hmmmm Intriguing offer, but I'll have to pass.

I don't really care what you are, but if you cover up the atrocities committed by invading muslims - that makes you an enemy.

You can criticize Islam all you want.

And I will criticize muslims too.