Hey didn't we already skip these middle-posts at the beginning of my last post? That was supposed to save us both time, cat.

wikiepaedoia!?

Tough titty, cat. It's a list of claims and sources. If you're not questioning the claim or source itself you might as well not wax No True Scott about a website they appeared in.

I think your non-reply on whether the PDF would be significant to you answers both of our questions about natural motive, if you think about it. I lack the motive to talk about it much more than I already have.

Hey didn't we already skip these middle-posts at the beginning of my last post? That was supposed to save us both time, cat.

wikiepaedoia!?

Tough titty, cat. It's a list of claims and sources. If you're not questioning the claim or source itself you might as well not wax No True Scottishman about a website they appeared in.

I think your non-reply on whether the PDF would be significant to you answers both of our questions about natural motive, if you think about it. I lack the motive to talk about it much more than I already have.