Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

SJWs are 99% blind to colonialism and opression if both parties are White.

They usually enthousiastically take part in shitting on ''marginalized peoples'' if they are White.

For example, trying to protect a native minority language in Europe gets in the way of mass-migration and accomodation for invaders, so the ZOG government will oppose anything meaningful ( any pressure on migrants to speak the native language = ''racist'' ).

In Canada : any consideration for ''disparate impact'' flies out of the window if we ask ''what about the disparate impact of mass-migration threathening the survival of French and Indigenous languages?''

SJW Crickets.

In Quebec, Mohawk activists ( who are native to the Great Lakes bassin, not Quebec ) decried mandatory French classes in Colleges as ''racist'' because it is ''colonialism'' to force Mohawks to speak French for that class instead of ''their own language''. What is ''their own language'' in this case? English. Lol.

Clown World.

30 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

SJWs are 99% blind to colonialism and opression if both parties are White.

They usually enthousiastically take part in shitting on ''marginalized peoples'' if they are White.

For example, trying to protect a native minority language in Europe gets in the way of mass-migration and accomodation for invaders, so the ZOG government will oppose anything meaningful ( any pressure on migrants to speak the native language = ''racist'' ).

In Canada : any consideration for ''disparate impact'' flies out of the window if we ask ''what about the disparate impact of mass-migration threathening the survival of French and Indigenous languages?''

SJW Crickets.

In Quebec, Mohawk activists ( who are native to the Great Lakes bassin, not Quebec ) decried mandatory French classes in Colleges as ''racist'' because it is ''colonialism'' to force Mohawks to speak French for that class instead of ''their own language''. What is ''their own language'' in this case? English.

Clown World.

30 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

SJWs are 99% blind to colonialism and opression if both parties are White.

They usually enthousiastically take part in shitting on ''marginalized peoples'' if they are White.

For example, trying to protect a native minority language in Europe gets in the way of mass-migration and accomodation for invaders, so the ZOG government will oppose anything meaningful ( any pressure on migrants to speak the native language = ''racist'' ).

In Canada : any consideration for ''disparate impact'' flies out of the window if we ask ''what about the disparate impact of mass-migration threathening the survival of French and Indigenous languages?''

SJW Crickets.

In Quebec, Mohawk activists ( who are native to the Great Lakes bassin, not Quebec ) decried mandatory French classes in Colleges as ''racist'' because it is ''colonialism'' to force Mohawks to speak French instead of ''their own language''. What is ''their own language'' in this case? English.

Clown World.

30 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

SJWs are 99% blind to colonialism and opression if both parties are White.

They usually enthousiastically take part in shitting on ''marginalized peoples'' if they are White.

For example, trying to protect a native minority language in Europe gets in the way of mass-migration and accomodation for invaders, so the ZOG government will oppose anything meaningful ( any pressure on migrants to speak the native language = ''racist'' ).

In Quebec, Mohawk activists ( who are native to the Great Lakes bassin, not Quebec ) decried mandatory French classes in Colleges as ''racist'' because it is ''colonialism'' to force Mohawks to speak French instead of ''their own language''. What is ''their own language'' in this case? English.

Clown World.

30 days ago
1 score