And thirty minutes later I came up with a simpler analogy for you. The difference between the left and right is perfectly exemplified by the difference between catholics and protestants. Catholics serve one centralized power. Protestants are free of that kind of structure.

While theoretically a throne like the pope's can be held by a moral man, human nature makes that highly unlikely and history has borne out proof in that the papacy has virtually always been used as a tool for the manipulaion of power, not for the good of the people. It is easily corruptible with very few points of failure. Meanwhile protestants can simply form their own churches at will, unbeholden to the corruptions of others. One corrupt protestant church can be rejected easily and ignored. One corrupt pope is catastrophic.

The catholic structure is a perfect example of the inherent failures of leftist ideology.

And thrity minutes later I came up with a simpler analogy for you. The difference between the left and right is perfectly exemplified by the difference between catholics and protestants. Catholics serve one centralized power. Protestants are free of that kind of structure.

While theoretically a throne like the pope's can be held by a moral man, human nature makes that highly unlikely and history has borne out proof in that the papacy has virtually always been used as a tool for the manipulaion of power, not for the good of the people. It is easily corruptible with very few points of failure. Meanwhile protestants can simply form their own churches at will, unbeholden to the corruptions of others. One corrupt protestant church can be rejected easily and ignored. One corrupt pope is catastrophic.

The catholic structure is a perfect example of the inherent failures of leftist ideology.