"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.

All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.

You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the scale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.

A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.

The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.

Federal enforcement of tolerance for faggotry is, again, a massive overreach of government power. My preferred structures would be to for the vote to be earned through dangerous service like Heinlein outlined, as a refined return to the intended design of the US as a limited republic. But voting rights, racial issues and such are not inherently left or right wing elements. Those are culturally relative elements, not core structures of political ideology. If you want to use government force to make the world comply with your preferences, that is left wing. If you want the government to be forced to fuck off and let your community self-regulate, that is right wing. Your community could be a rainbow faggot parade or entirely reject faggotry, neither is inherently left or right. The difference between the left and the right is how you use government, not the details. Right wing structures tend towards stronger moral development because right wing ideologies come from stronger mental development. That doesn't make an anarchist gay vilage of a hundred people with basically no government left wing, nor does it make the national socialists of WW2 Germany right wing.

"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.

All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.

You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the scale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.

A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.

The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.

Federal enforcement of tolerance for faggotry is, again, a massive overreach of government power. My preferred structures would be to for the vote to be earned through dangerous service like Heinlein outlined, as a refined return to the intended design of the US as a limited republic. But voting rights, racial issues and such are not inherently left or right wing elements. Those are culturally relative elements, not core structures of political ideology. If you want to use government force to make the world comply with your preferences, that is left wing. If you want the government to be forced to fuck off and let your community self-regulate, that is right wing. Your community could be a rainbow faggot parade or entirely reject faggotry, neither is inherently left or right. The difference between the left and the right is how you use government, not the details. Right wing structures tend towards stronger moral development because right wing ideologies come from stronger mental development. That doesn't make an anarchist gay commune of a hundred people with basically no government left wing, nor does it make the national socialists of WW2 Germany right wing.

"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.

All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.

You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the acale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.

A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.

The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.

Federal enforcement of tolerance for faggotry is, again, a massive overreach of government power. My preferred structures would be to for the vote to be earned through dangerous service like Heinlein outlined, as a refined return to the intended design of the US as a limited republic. But voting rights, racial issues and such are not inherently left or right wing elements. Those are culturally relative elements, not core structures of political ideology. If you want to use government force to make the world comply with your preferences, that is left wing. If you want the government to be forced to fuck off and let your community self-regulate, that is right wing. Your community could be a rainbow faggot parade or entirely reject faggotry, neither is inherently left or right. The difference between the left and the right is how you use government, not the details. Right wing structures tend towards stronger moral development because right wing ideologies come from stronger mental development. That doesn't make an anarchist gay commune of a hundred people with basically no government left wing, nor does it make the national socialists of WW2 Germany right wing.

"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.

All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.

You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the acale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.

A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.

The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.