Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' (Yes, again!) In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers, like the kind of Leftists in the Socialist Rifle Association and Pink Pistols.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belorussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', and many of those they succeed in abducting still struggle against them. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade that he must have saved up for the occasion, one that he must have felt was inevitable, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. In conclusion, you can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' (Yes, again!) In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers, like the kind of Leftists in the Socialist Rifle Association and Pink Pistols.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belorussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', and many of those they succeed in abducting still struggle against them. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade that he must have saved up for the occasion, one that he must have felt was inevitable, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' (Yes, again!) In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers, like the kind of Leftists in the Socialist Rifle Association and Pink Pistols.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belorussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', and many of those they succeed in abducting still struggle against them. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade that he must have saved up for the occasion, one that he must have felt was inevitable, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' Again! In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers, like the kind of Leftists in the Socialist Rifle Association and Pink Pistols.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belorussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', and many of those they succeed in abducting still struggle against them. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade that he must have saved up for the occasion, one that he must have felt was inevitable, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' Again! In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers, like the kind of Leftists in the Socialist Rifle Association and Pink Pistols.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belorussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' Again! In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers, like the kind of Leftists in the Socialist Rifle Association and Pink Pistols.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Even a Whites-only draft would be 'racist'. Consider a narrative like the following, how easily it would spread: 'The Whites are training their young people to kill non-whites overseas, which is all in preparation for the genocide that they are to commit against us when they bring them back to America! It's a White supremacist plot!' Again! In short, there is no draft that is not racist and White supremacist. Next, look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is practically inescapable. Finally, a racially-discriminatory draft probably requires massive changes in law.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free. All of this happened within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. Once they figured out what he did, they gave him a pat on the back and let him walk free within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could slow it, let alone stop or reverse it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter. But since the 'neo-Nazis', Republicans and Russians are at a lesser stage of degeneration than they, all three matter, all three are forms of the same 'evil' (i.e. regeneration), and all three must be destroyed.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing. The only thing to which they are intrinsically committed is maintaining the pace of degeneration of all kinds: positivizing it, promoting it, and combating anything that could stop, reverse, or even slow it. Since public health and foreign policies are largely amoral, they do not matter.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters'. Maybe a month ago, one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years before that, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. Forget trying to get them to build or repair the things. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. Operating drones is probably all that they could manage. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races. Look at the racial demographics of people of fighting age: drafting non-whites is inescapable.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

It's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that the Biden Administration would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. They will disobey pandemic lock-downs to fight 'racism'; they will be 'anti-vaxxers' if they think that the vaccine in question has something to do with the 'Right-wing'; they will support wars that they see the 'Right-wing' as opposing.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump when the Taliban seized it back? Suddenly, many of them openly wished that Biden would continue the occupation.

All this demonstrates that the Left has no serious commitment to pandemic lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or being 'anti-war'. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West? The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' What about Afghanistan? They were all for withdrawal from during the Obama Administration, but look at how many of them blamed Trump for discontinuing the occupation when the Taliban seized it back? All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs, vaccine mandates, or 'anti-war' stances either. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West?

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

Look at the 'draft' in the Ukraine: literally abducting random men off the street and taking them away in unmarked vehicles. And yet look at how many resist: many successfully run away, some successfully manage to beat up the 'recruiters', one even blew himself up with a grenade, severely wounding at least one 'recruiter'. A few days ago, I saw a video of a Ukrainian who stole a tank and drove straight to the Russian frontlines to surrender. They let him go within a few minutes. You can't even draft the comparatively normal Ukrainians. What makes you think that you can draft the much more dysfunctional people of the West?

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them under select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original Covid anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them underneath select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.]', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them underneath select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all, let alone engage in war-fighting. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them underneath select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them underneath select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist, 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things. The America, Australia, Canada, &c. of 1968 no longer exist: these countries simply can no longer manage the things that they once could.

177 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This will never happen.

Every Western society, without exception, is far less cohesive than it was back in 1968. Ever-growing numbers of people are mentally and physically ill (particularly obese), and are simply incapable of being effective at doing much of anything at all. The willpower isn't there either. There is far more ideological polarization: 'The war is -ist &or -phobic', 'The war is that of [the bourgeoisie, the patriarchy, the tyrannical State, the Zionazis, &c.', 'We'll all die from climate change anyway, so what's the point?', 'This is the trans genocide we've all been warning about! They'll go door to door and we'll be forced to choose at gunpoint between being genocided overseas or being genocided in our homes!'.

Not to mention the racial problems: just try a draft in 2024 America and see how well that goes down in non-white areas. 'It's a White supremacist plot! They're getting us to fight their wars, and all so that they can seize America in our absence!' It'll make the George Floyd riots look like child's play. Furthermore, there is no real way that they could only draft Whites in order to avoid antagonizing the other races.

The Ukraine War has seen leftist individuals [...] travel to Ukraine and participate in fighting.

This is the only compelling point that you have in your favour, but it's clear that the vast majority of them aren't up for it, as evidenced by the fact that they're still in our societies today. Years ago, similar idiots went to Rojava to fight against Islamic State on behalf of the Kurds and their libertarian socialist nonsense. You'll always find a few outliers.

You also have to keep in mind that the Russians and Belarussians are painted by the West as 'White Far-Right Nazis': the very worst thing that you could possibly be in late-modernity. Everything from education to Hollywood to mass media has whipped up existential fear and hatred of this group for almost a century: they are Satan for secular people. By contrast, you can't convincingly paint the 'yellow' feminist Marxists of East Asia and the brown Muslim world as goosestepping Hollywood Nazis. Mass repression of Tibetans and Uighurs doesn't elicit the same response that the 'Holocaust' does. Likewise, the world isn't cheering on Israel's mass murder of Palestinians the way they would be if they were killing literal Nazis.

Someone else mentioned 'but Covid' (i.e. lock-downs and vaccine mandates) in the comments as a point in your favour. I don't see that as remotely comparable. Re-read my first paragraph and observe that none of it happened during Covid. Mental and physical illness wouldn't impact most people's ability to get vaccinated. Nor does ideology matter. Kamala was the original anti-vaxxer, saying on air that she wouldn't take 'Trump's vaccine' because it was 'rushed' in time for the election. Then the Biden Administration came in and suddenly being an 'anti-vaxxer' was 'Far-Right'. And look who violated the lock-downs when the Fentanyl Floyd riots occurred? If anything, not violating the lock-downs was what would cast suspicion on you at that time. 'Why aren't you out there protesting for racial justice? You some kind of Nazi or something?' All this demonstrates that the Left isn't really committed to lock-downs or vaccine mandates either. They become instrumentally committed to them underneath select circumstances, such as when they need an excuse to prevent their perceived enemies from protesting or for oppositionist and 'enemy of my enemy is friend' reasons: the Republicans don't like these things very much, we don't like the Republicans, therefore we will go the other way and embrace said things.

177 days ago
1 score