Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the people who value group survival over social virtue undermines any status of superiority that is determined by social virtue.

At the most basic level this is not even a conscious thought process. It is the context from which their conscious thought process operates. Once it is trained in, the pursuit of superiority by social virtue is no more consciously deliberate than their personal, private, socially taboo kneejerk reaction to the body odor of an ethnically african person (which is trained in at a deeper level, being from birth, in the case of anyone who grew up in a house without africans in it).

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the people who value group survival over social virtue undermines any status of superiority that is determined by social virtue.

At the most basic level this is not even a conscious thought process. It is the context from which their conscious thought process operates. Once it is trained in, the concept of superiority demonstrated by social virtue no more consciously deliberate than their personal, private kneejerk reaction to the body odor of an ethnically african person.

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the racists, who value group survival over social virtue, are seen as a threat to the status superiority of the white racial group over non-white races, judged strictly by their own system of value that no other races actually use.

At the most basic level this is not even a conscious thought process. It is the context from which their conscious thought process operates. Once it is trained in, the concept of superiority demonstrated by social virtue no more consciously deliberate than their personal, private kneejerk reaction to the body odor of an ethnically african person.

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the racists, who value group survival over social virtue, are seen as a threat to the status superiority of the white racial group over non-white races, judged strictly by their own system of value that no other races or ideological sects of whites acknowledge the legitimacy of.

At the most basic level this is not even a conscious thought process. It is the context from which their conscious thought process operates. Once it is trained in, the concept of superiority demonstrated by social virtue no more consciously deliberate than their personal, private kneejerk reaction to the body odor of an ethnically african person.

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the racists, who value group survival over social virtue, are seen as a threat to the status superiority of the white racial group over non-white races, judged of course strictly by values that the racist whites won't acknowledge.

At the most basic level this is not even a conscious thought process. It is the context from which their conscious thought process operates. Once it is trained in, the concept of superiority demonstrated by social virtue no more consciously deliberate than their personal, private kneejerk reaction to the body odor of an ethnically african person.

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the racists, who value group survival over social virtue, are seen as a threat to the status superiority of the white racial group over non-white races, judged of course strictly by values that the racist whites won't acknowledge.

At the most basic level this is not even a conscious thought process. It is the context from which their conscious thought process operates. Once it is trained in, the concept of superiority demonstrated by social virtue no more conscious than their personal, private reaction to the body odor of an ethnically african person.

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual social virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.

From their perspective it is the white racists that threaten their superiority, not entirely via in-group competition for dominance, but because the racists, who value group survival over social virtue, are seen as a threat to the status superiority of the white racial group over non-white races, judged of course strictly by values that the racist whites won't acknowledge.

Not true. Their insistence that this is the case is only an expression of in-group preference. Their value system leads to them valuing individual virtue above group survival and so they express superiority differently.

They think tolerance is grace and that a superior being should display traits of superior quality. Their only motive to signal virtue is to tell others, "see, I treat the lowly with grace, because I am great." This is also why they want to be seen offering only understanding and forgiveness to people of other races who fail to reciprocate their values- it amplifies their own feeling of superiority, since they succeeded the standard- hopefully in sight of others- where the nonwhite person failed, theirby validating their own station of high grace.