Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I doubt Nintendo gives a fuck either way. They're probably more interested in this part:

any feature or component of a covered platform that will encourage or increase the frequency, time spent, or activity of minors on the covered platform, or activity of minors on the covered platform.
Design features include but are not limited to
(A) infinite scrolling or auto play;
(B) rewards for time spent on the platform;
(C) notifications;
(D) personalized recommendation systems;
(E) in-game purchases; or
(F) appearance altering filters.

If they can get consoles exempted because of their extremely walled-garden nature, it's a move to eliminate mobile as a competitor.

But just on principle, any propsal that:

  1. Lets the government dictate how an app is designed
  2. Allow the government to dictate what can be published
  3. Erodes anonymity online

Is an instant hard no. It doesn't matter if the people they're censoring are ones who fucking deserve it. Absolutely not.

186 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I doubt Nintendo gives a fuck either way. They're probably more interested in this part:

any feature or component of a covered platform that will encourage or increase the frequency, time spent, or activity of minors on the covered platform, or activity of minors on the covered platform.
Design features include but are not limited to
(A) infinite scrolling or auto play;
(B) rewards for time spent on the platform;
(C) notifications;
(D) personalized recommendation systems;
(E) in-game purchases; or
(F) appearance altering filters.

If they can get consoles exempted because of their extremely walled-garden nature, it's a move to eliminate mobile as a competitor.

186 days ago
1 score