You'd think with all this surveillance the feds would make a big press release on how they stopped an attack. Instead, it's always "the suspect was on the FBI's radar", and that's being charitable and assuming they're not outright grooming them for their annual budget increases.

You'd think with all this surveillance the feds would make a high-profile press release on how they stopped an attack. Instead, it's always "the suspect was on the FBI's radar", and that's being charitable and assuming they're not outright grooming them for their annual budget increases.

You'd think with all this surveillance, the feds would make a high-profile press release on how they stopped an attack. Instead, it's always "the suspect was on the FBI's radar", and that's being charitable and assuming they're not outright grooming them for their annual budget increases.

You'd think with all this surveillance, the feds would make a high-profile press release on how they stopped an attack. Instead, it's always "the suspect was on the FBI's radar, and that's being charitable and assuming they're not outright grooming them for their annual budget increases.