I don't give a damn about your Paulite books. So far as I'm concerned there are three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) and John and that's it.

But Paul.... he wasn't at the supper, he doesn't get the title. He was a fanboy at best, a tool of the anti-christ at worst. From my perspective you might as well be talking about Joseph Smith.

I don't give a damn about your Paulite books. So far as I'm concerned there are three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) and John and that's it.

But Paul.... he wasn't at the supper, he doesn't get the title. He was a fucking fanboy at best, a tool of the anti-christ at worst. From my perspective you might as well be talking about Joseph Smith.

I don't give a damn about your Paulite books. So far as I'm concerned there are three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) and that's it.

But Paul.... he wasn't at the supper, he doesn't get the title. He was a fucking fanboy at best, a tool of the anti-christ at worst. From my perspective you might as well be talking about Joseph Smith.

I don't give a damn about your Paulite books. So far as I'm concerned there are four gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) and that's it; and frankly I'm personally a little iffy on John.

But Paul.... he wasn't at the supper, he doesn't get the title. He was a fucking fanboy at best, a tool of the anti-christ at worst. From my perspective you might as well be talking about Joseph Smith.

I don't give a damn about your Paulite books. So far as I'm concerned there are four gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) and that's it.

He wasn't at the supper, he doesn't get the title. He was a fucking fanboy at best, a tool of the anti-christ at worst. From my perspective you might as well be talking about Joseph Smith.