CP is CP because you can prove that someone under 18 was depicted. Emphasis on someone. There has to be a victim.

Now, arguably, if you did draw a specific human doing sexual activities, that is underage, then you would be creating CP. It kind of has the same effect, right? It's trying to prevent children being exposed before they can consent to it.

Look I follow the harm principle to the edge of reason on this. What I mean by that is extending the most broad definition of harm for the sake of children. This strikes me as a caution. It's already sketch to charge people with distributing CDs, and in fact the prosecution of "CP" has already resulted in many government overreaches. So that's as real a threat as the pedos.

CP is CP because you can prove that someone under 18 was depicted. Emphasis on someone. There has to be a victim.

Now, arguably, if you did draw a specific human doing sexual activities, that is underage, then you would be creating CP. It kind of has the same effect, right? It's trying to prevent children being exposed before they can consent to it.

Look I follow the harm principle to the edge of reason on this. What I mean by that is extending the most broad definition of harm for the sake of children. It's already sketch to charge people with distributing CDs.

CP is CP because you can prove that someone under 18 was depicted. Emphasis on someone. There has to be a victim.

Now, arguably, if you did draw a specific human doing sexual activities, that is underage, then you would be creating CP. It kind of has the same effect, right? It's trying to prevent children being exposed before they can consent to it.